38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Dangerous for political parties to invoke caste, regional sentiments: SC

By Jhanak Sharma      15 July, 2025 08:10 PM      0 Comments
Dangerous for political parties to invoke caste regional sentiments SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it is dangerous for the political parties to invoke caste and regional sentiments, while declining to entertain a plea seeking directions to the Election Commission to deregister All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Musalimeen (AIMIM), led by MP Asaduddin Owaisi.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Justice Joymala Bagchi said it is not keen to consider the petition, which contended that AIMIM sought to raise the issue of Muslims only.

“Let us not confine ourselves to the question of communal party…there are some regional parties, and they also indulge in raising regional sentiments. Is it appropriate or in the interest of national integration? There are some political parties which rely on caste consideration, that is equally dangerous,” the bench said.

The bench suggested that it will be appropriate to focus on a larger and wider perspective, and asked the petitioner file a petition on the larger issue of political parties invoking communal statements.

A plea was filed by Shiv Sena’s Telangana wing, Tirupati Narasimha Murari, against an order of the Delhi High Court, which dismissed the petition challenging the registration of AIMIM as a political party by the ECI.

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain argued the petitioner before the court.

During the hearing, the bench said, “suppose a particular religious law is protected under the Constitution and a political party says it will teach that law, they will teach because it is protected".

The bench said it will be a great thing if political parties also invest in education, and they can establish colleges, schools, engineering and medical colleges.

Referring to the party’s constitution, advocate Jain contended that clause 1 says that they strive for unity among the Muslims, and asked “why only Muslims and why not all of us".

The bench asked the counsel to read clause 1 in conjunction with clause 8, and also clause 9, and pointed at the undertaking they had given as a political party in 1989, saying that it takes care of everything.

“In practical life, suppose in an election you find a candidate of this political party invoking communal sentiments…there you are right. Any political party indulging, we will invoke the law," the bench said.

Jain, relying upon the apex court’s judgment in Abhiram Singh (1996), said the strict mandate was that no political party or candidate would ask for votes in the name of religion, and asked the court to see how this mandate is getting violated.

“Throughout the election, if you are asking for votes in the name of religion, the question is whether the judgment delivered in the Abhiram Singh case is being effectively implemented,” Jain asked.

The bench said that this judgment will be relied upon in an election petition, “where you find a candidate of a political party is indulging in arousing the religious sentiments to get votes, and therefore, such an act will fall within a mischievous practice”.

Seeking a mandate from the apex court against communal politics, Jain said there is a vacuum.

“You may be right, there is some vacuum or grey area, which needs to be filled in,” the bench said.

Jain insisted that votes are being sought in the name of religion and caste, and asked if the only remedy is to file an election petition.

“Perhaps a neutral petition and not accusing any (political party)…which accuses each and every one,” the bench said.

Jain pointed out that in 2021, a similar petition was filed before this court, and the notice was issued on it, but that petition was withdrawn.

The bench asked Jain to withdraw the present petition, and the court will give him liberty to raise larger issues seeking reforms in respect of political parties. 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email