38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Daughters are daughters forever and sons are sons till they are married: Bombay HC orders son and his family to vacate parents' flat [READ JUDGMENT]

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      20 September, 2021 12:52 PM      0 Comments
 Daughters are daughters forever and sons are sons till they are married: Bombay HC orders son and his family to vacate parents' flat [READ JUDGMENT]

On 15th September 2021, the Bombay High Court Justice G.S.Kulkarni ordered a son and his family to leave the premises of his fathers flat after looking at the condition of his elderly parentsin the case of  Ashish Vinod Dalal & Ors. v. Vinod Ramanlal Dalal & Ors.

BACKGROUND

The parents who are respondents 1 and 2, in this case, were dragged to the High Court by petitioner 1 and 2 who are the son and the daughter-in-law of the respondents after the order of the Maintenance Tribunal, against which the petitioners appealed in the High Court. 

ORDER OF MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL 

The parents had to rely on the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 as the petitioners were trying to illegally occupy the house where the parents were living and had allowed their son and his family to reside, besides this the son and his family were also responsible for torturing and harassing the old couple for various years. 

The maintenance tribunal had provided them with relief by making a judgement in their favour.   

FACTS ABOUT THE  PROPERTY 

The flat where the petitioner( son and his wife) and respondents (elderly parents) were living belonged to the father i.e. the respondent who gave it to his daughters through a gift deed. The sisters of the petitioner had allowed their parents to reside in the house because of their old age. 

OBSERVATION OF THE HIGH COURT

The High Court while giving its judgement observed that this is a classic case where the petitioners are becoming an obstacle and hindering the elderly couple in leading a normal life.   

Furthermore, the Honble Judge held that the various legal proceedings that have transpired between the respondents and the petitioners are enough evidence that the parents have been suffering and have been harassed by their son and his family.

RATIONALE BEHIND THE JUDGEMENT 

The Court held that the property is not ancestral and hence the petitioners do not have any claim on the said property as per the Succession laws.

Therefore, it was pronounced by the court that the petitioners do not have any legal right to reside in the premises of the parents house and doing so hinders their right to lead a normal life in their old age. 

The Judge further observed in order to further substantiate the case that Daughters are daughters forever and sons are sons till they are married albeit there would surely be exemplary exceptions.

ORDER OF THE COURT 

The court ordered that the petitioners along with their families are required to vacate the premises of the respondents house within a period of ten days, otherwise they would be evicted with the help of police as ordered by the Tribunal previously.

 

[READ JUDGMENT]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email