38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      03 August, 2023 01:49 AM      0 Comments
Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has refused to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister, Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister, Ashok Gehlot.

Special Judge  N K Nagpal also declined a request to stay the summons issued against Gehlot by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Court.

A court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) had on July 6 said that the accused, Gehlot prima facie made "specific defamatory statements against Shekhawat and had issued summons against him.  

"Prima facie, it appears that the defamatory statements of the accused (Ashok Gehlot) have been sufficiently published in the newspaper/electronic media/social media, which may make the right thinking members of the society shun the complainant, the ACMM had said.

Gehlot challenged the summons in court of the Special Judge of N K Nagpal refused to stay it.

"This court sees no reason or ground to either stay the proceedings against Gehlot or the direction of the magisterial court summoning him (Gehlot), Judge Nagpal said.

In the revision plea against the order of the magisterial court, Gehlot contended that he order was incorrect, illegal and improper.

It was argued that the court did not take cognisance of the offence, and therefore, it couldnt have summoned him as an accused.

Gehlot's lawyer submitted that  statements or speeches made against Shekhawat and his family members through the electronic or print media were based on records of a criminal case currently under investigation and, as a result, were not defamatory.

Shekhawats counsel, on the other hand, pointed out that inquiry reports of the Delhi Police indicated that Gehlots statements were defamatory in nature and were meant to defame and tarnish the formers image.

Judge Nagpal, however, directed the magisterial court to not insist on Gehlots physical presence, and allowed him to join the proceedings virtually.

Shekhawat has alleged in his complaint that Gehlot has been making defamatory remarks against him over an alleged scam and trying to tarnish his image and affect his political career.

In April, Union Jal Shakti Minister Shekhawat approached the Rouse Avenue Court, claiming that the Chief Minister defamed him by falsely accusing him of being involved in the Rs 900-crore Sanjivani Credit Society scam. He claimed his name did not appear anywhere when the Rajasthan government probed the case.

Shekhawat sought prosecution of Gehlot under the India Penal Code for criminal defamation.

The matter is fixed for hearing on August 19.

[Read Order]  



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Rajasthan HC Issues Show Cause Notice to CM Gehlot Over Remarks on Judiciary Rajasthan HC Issues Show Cause Notice to CM Gehlot Over Remarks on Judiciary

The Rajasthan High Court issues a show cause notice to Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot for his remarks on alleged corruption in the judiciary. Advocates protest and demand accountability. Get the latest updates on this legal controversy.

TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email