38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Gymkhana Club: NCLT Permits Centre To Take Over

By LawStreet News Network      02 April, 2022 05:28 PM      0 Comments
NCLT Permits Centre To Take Over

On 1st April2022, Central government's plea to take over the affairs of the Delhi Gymkhana Club has been allowed by The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) thereby appointing a 15-member committee to manage its affairs.

Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj represented the Centre while the Delhi Gymkhana Club was represented by advocate Namit Saxena.

The order was passed by President Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar and Member Narender Kumar Bhola. The order was passed while adjudicating a petition moved by the Central government under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 alleging that the affairs of Delhi Gymkhana Club were highly prejudicial to public interest. 

The Central government, in its petition before the National Company Law Tribunal mentioned that following the several complaints received, the affairs of M/s Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd were inspected by it under Section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. 

After its rigorous investigation, Central government alleged that there was rampant mismanagement by the General Committee of the Club, which were violative of the Articles of Association and the Companies Act, 2013. 

It was further alleged that over the years, the successive General Committees of the Club had vaguely twisted the objects of the company and functioned in a manner so as to remain in control of the Club through an "unauthorised and complicated succession mechanism". 

The admission process to the Club had over time become dynastic, alleged the Central Government. It was alleged that the members of the General Committee of the Club were acting for the benefit of a few chosen members, and which meant at the expense of the General Public. 

To bring an end to the said mismanagement of all kinds, the Central government had sought a direction to appoint 15 persons as directors to the General Committee of the Club/Company to manage its affairs. The plea was thus allowed.

Case Title: Union of India, MCA v Delhi Gymkhana Club



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email