38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Allows Sameer Wankhede to Amend Jurisdiction; Defamation Suit Against Netflix & Red Chillies to Proceed

By Jhanak Sharma      26 September, 2025 08:02 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Allows Sameer Wankhede to Amend Jurisdiction Defamation Suit Against Netflix and Red Chillies to Proceed

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Friday (September 26) granted relief to IRS officer Sameer Wankhede, permitting him to amend his jurisdictional pleadings in his high-profile defamation suit against Red Chillies Entertainment, Netflix, and others over the controversial series “Ba*ds of Bollywood”.

The matter came up before Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, who at the outset questioned how the suit was maintainable in Delhi. The court noted that the plaint, as originally filed, did not contain sufficient averments to establish jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).

Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi, appearing for Wankhede, argued that the web series was accessible across India, including Delhi, and that memes targeting the plaintiff were also circulated in the capital. The court, however, observed orally that the plaint in its current form was “not maintainable” and indicated that the pleadings would need to be corrected.

At this stage, Sethi sought liberty to amend the plaint, which the court allowed. Justice Kaurav directed that once the amendments are made, the matter will be listed for further hearing by the Registry, without fixing a specific date.

On the other side, Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for Red Chillies Entertainment, while Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi represented Netflix, reflecting the heavyweight legal representation on both sides.

Also Watch

The suit names multiple defendants, including Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., Netflix, Google LLC, Meta Platforms, X Corp (formerly Twitter), RPG Lifestyle Media Pvt. Ltd., and certain unnamed parties. Wankhede has sought ₹2 crore in damages, which he has stated will be donated to the Tata Memorial Cancer Hospital for the treatment of cancer patients.

According to the plaint, the Netflix series was “deliberately conceptualised and executed” to malign Wankhede’s reputation in a “colourable and prejudicial manner,” especially while proceedings involving him and Aryan Khan remain pending before the Bombay High Court and the NDPS Special Court, Mumbai.

The suit also highlights a scene where a character is shown making an obscene gesture—raising a middle finger after reciting the slogan “Satyamev Jayate.” Wankhede contends that this amounts to a violation of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, and also runs afoul of provisions under the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), as it seeks to outrage national sentiment through obscene and offensive material.

With the High Court’s order, Wankhede’s defamation suit remains very much alive, pending further hearing after the required amendments are made.

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email