38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, March 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Seeks Reply from Centre and Delhi Government on PIL filed by Law Students Against Physical Exams By GGSIPU

By M V Manasa      04 November, 2020 04:52 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Delhi Government Physical Exams GGSIPU

On Monday (02 November 2020), Delhi High Court sought the response of the Centre and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by several law students of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) for postponement and cancellation of the regular physical exams which are to be held from 02 November in the main campus as well as the affiliated colleges under the varsity.

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan issued notice to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Delhi Government, GGSIPU, Bar Council of India (BCI), University Grants Commission (UGC), Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (VIPS) and Amity University seeking their stand on the plea by 12 November. But the Court did not pass any interim orders in the ongoing matter. The students of GGSIPU mentioned that despite already giving multiple examinations under various notifications issued by respective colleges and now are being directed to give the same in the offline mode i.e. the physical mode of examinations for the same course.

The plea filed by Advocates Jahnvi Sharma and Paritosh Dhawan said the following,

The changing nature of notifications and the short time span between exams has made it burdensome for the petitioners (students) to manage studies, online classes, distanced learning, internal exams of previous semester followed by internal exams of curd semester clashing with current semester classes followed by physical examinations within a week.

As per the PIL,

A blanket notification forcing all the students to give exams through physical mode causes immense duress to the mental health of the students and is violative of the Right to Life. Further, an extreme schedule of overlapping teaching of two semesters squeezed into one goes against the Right To Quality Education.

Senior Advocate Sudhanshu Batra appearing on behalf of the students submitted before the Court that BCI released a resolution on 1 November, about allowing universities and colleges to conduct physical examinations after getting no-objection certificates from the State Government and State Disaster Management authorities. As per the resolution of the BCI, universities, and colleges are supposed to inform the students about holding physical exams and give them the option of taking them now or after the pandemic situation is normalized. The resolution also permitted universities and colleges to hold online examinations if they have the requisite infrastructure to do so. However, the GGSIPU didnt adhere to any of the BCI resolutions, said the petitioner's lawyers. In the plea, they decided to set aside the September 30 notification of GGSIPU with regard to holding of minor test through the physical mode of examinations from 2 November for assessment purposes. 

A PIL was listed before the honorable Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and HMJ Prateek Jalan. Advocates Mr. Sudhanshu Batra along with Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani and Ms. Jahnvi Sharma, Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, and order appeared before the High Court Bench.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email