38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Seeks Reply from Centre and Delhi Government on PIL filed by Law Students Against Physical Exams By GGSIPU

By M V Manasa      04 November, 2020 04:52 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Delhi Government Physical Exams GGSIPU

On Monday (02 November 2020), Delhi High Court sought the response of the Centre and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by several law students of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) for postponement and cancellation of the regular physical exams which are to be held from 02 November in the main campus as well as the affiliated colleges under the varsity.

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan issued notice to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Delhi Government, GGSIPU, Bar Council of India (BCI), University Grants Commission (UGC), Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (VIPS) and Amity University seeking their stand on the plea by 12 November. But the Court did not pass any interim orders in the ongoing matter. The students of GGSIPU mentioned that despite already giving multiple examinations under various notifications issued by respective colleges and now are being directed to give the same in the offline mode i.e. the physical mode of examinations for the same course.

The plea filed by Advocates Jahnvi Sharma and Paritosh Dhawan said the following,

The changing nature of notifications and the short time span between exams has made it burdensome for the petitioners (students) to manage studies, online classes, distanced learning, internal exams of previous semester followed by internal exams of curd semester clashing with current semester classes followed by physical examinations within a week.

As per the PIL,

A blanket notification forcing all the students to give exams through physical mode causes immense duress to the mental health of the students and is violative of the Right to Life. Further, an extreme schedule of overlapping teaching of two semesters squeezed into one goes against the Right To Quality Education.

Senior Advocate Sudhanshu Batra appearing on behalf of the students submitted before the Court that BCI released a resolution on 1 November, about allowing universities and colleges to conduct physical examinations after getting no-objection certificates from the State Government and State Disaster Management authorities. As per the resolution of the BCI, universities, and colleges are supposed to inform the students about holding physical exams and give them the option of taking them now or after the pandemic situation is normalized. The resolution also permitted universities and colleges to hold online examinations if they have the requisite infrastructure to do so. However, the GGSIPU didnt adhere to any of the BCI resolutions, said the petitioner's lawyers. In the plea, they decided to set aside the September 30 notification of GGSIPU with regard to holding of minor test through the physical mode of examinations from 2 November for assessment purposes. 

A PIL was listed before the honorable Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and HMJ Prateek Jalan. Advocates Mr. Sudhanshu Batra along with Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani and Ms. Jahnvi Sharma, Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, and order appeared before the High Court Bench.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email