38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Seeks Reply from Centre and Delhi Government on PIL filed by Law Students Against Physical Exams By GGSIPU

By M V Manasa      04 November, 2020 04:52 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Delhi Government Physical Exams GGSIPU

On Monday (02 November 2020), Delhi High Court sought the response of the Centre and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by several law students of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) for postponement and cancellation of the regular physical exams which are to be held from 02 November in the main campus as well as the affiliated colleges under the varsity.

A bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan issued notice to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Delhi Government, GGSIPU, Bar Council of India (BCI), University Grants Commission (UGC), Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (VIPS) and Amity University seeking their stand on the plea by 12 November. But the Court did not pass any interim orders in the ongoing matter. The students of GGSIPU mentioned that despite already giving multiple examinations under various notifications issued by respective colleges and now are being directed to give the same in the offline mode i.e. the physical mode of examinations for the same course.

The plea filed by Advocates Jahnvi Sharma and Paritosh Dhawan said the following,

The changing nature of notifications and the short time span between exams has made it burdensome for the petitioners (students) to manage studies, online classes, distanced learning, internal exams of previous semester followed by internal exams of curd semester clashing with current semester classes followed by physical examinations within a week.

As per the PIL,

A blanket notification forcing all the students to give exams through physical mode causes immense duress to the mental health of the students and is violative of the Right to Life. Further, an extreme schedule of overlapping teaching of two semesters squeezed into one goes against the Right To Quality Education.

Senior Advocate Sudhanshu Batra appearing on behalf of the students submitted before the Court that BCI released a resolution on 1 November, about allowing universities and colleges to conduct physical examinations after getting no-objection certificates from the State Government and State Disaster Management authorities. As per the resolution of the BCI, universities, and colleges are supposed to inform the students about holding physical exams and give them the option of taking them now or after the pandemic situation is normalized. The resolution also permitted universities and colleges to hold online examinations if they have the requisite infrastructure to do so. However, the GGSIPU didnt adhere to any of the BCI resolutions, said the petitioner's lawyers. In the plea, they decided to set aside the September 30 notification of GGSIPU with regard to holding of minor test through the physical mode of examinations from 2 November for assessment purposes. 

A PIL was listed before the honorable Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and HMJ Prateek Jalan. Advocates Mr. Sudhanshu Batra along with Mr. Bhuvan Gugnani and Ms. Jahnvi Sharma, Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, and order appeared before the High Court Bench.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email