38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Seeking Regulation Of Content On Netflix, Amazon Prime

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Seeking Regulation Of Content On Netflix, Amazon Prime

The Delhi High Court today (February 8, 2019) dismissed a petition seeking regulation of content shown on online platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime and others.

The order was passed by a two-Judge Bench comprising of Chief JusticeRajendra Menon and Justice V. Kameswar Rao on a petition filed by an NGO, Justice for Rights Foundation through Advocate Harpreet Singh Hora, calling for the Delhi High Courts intervention to clamp down on the unregulated, uncertified, sexually explicit, vulgar, profane and legally restricted content broadcasted on the online platforms.

The Delhi High Court on hearing the plea had directed the Centre to clarify if there were any existing guidelines or licensing policies for regulation of content available on such online streaming websites.

To which the Central Government informed the court that the online platforms were neither required to obtain a license from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting nor was its content regulated by it.

The Ministry of Law and Justice also informed that the subject matter was outside its domain.

Further, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology also clarified that the online platforms did not fall in under the scope of Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, online platforms, which do not curate their content completely are expected to follow the Rules made under the Act, and the ones which do completely curate their content need to ensure compliance of Sections 66E, 67 and 67B of the Act.

Thus noting that the court cannot direct the online platforms to get a licence since the same is not required under the law, the court dismissed the plea.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email