38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 08, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Grants Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction in ‘Neelgagan’ Trademark Case Against Rainbow Paper Industries [Read Order]

By Samriddhi Ojha      15 January, 2026 11:36 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Grants Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction in Neelgagan Trademark Case Against Rainbow Paper Industries

New Delhi: In a significant order, the Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of Haryana Traders Pvt. Ltd. (the Plaintiff) against Rainbow Paper Industries Private Limited and others (the Defendants) in a commercial suit concerning the infringement of the registered trademark ‘Neelgagan’.

The suit, CS (COMM) 936/2025, was filed by Haryana Traders Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in the business of manufacturing, exporting, supplying, and trading stationery products, seeking a permanent injunction restraining infringement of its registered trademark ‘Neelgagan’, along with ancillary reliefs. The Plaintiff submitted that it has secured multiple registrations for its ‘Neelgagan’ trademarks over the past seven decades and enjoys a widespread presence across India.

The Plaintiff alleged that Defendant No. 1, Rainbow Paper Industries Pvt. Ltd., which is engaged in the business of plastic stationery products, is using the Plaintiff’s trademarks alongside its brand name ‘Rainbow’, specifically the mark “Neelgagan” (the Impugned Mark), with a deliberate and fraudulent intent to create a false association between the Defendants and the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff’s counsel submitted that a Vendor Agreement dated 27.12.2024 was executed between the parties to delineate the limited rights concerning the Plaintiff’s intellectual property. However, the Plaintiff subsequently became aware of the Defendants’ infringing activities, including unauthorised usage on promotional materials such as Diwali gift packages and Gandhi Jayanti posters. This led the Plaintiff to issue an intimation letter dated 01.01.2025 and a cease-and-desist notice dated 02.06.2025, both of which remained unanswered by the Defendants.

Considering the submissions, pleadings, and documents on record, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia observed that:

“A prima facie case has been made out by the Plaintiff for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction. The balance of convenience lies in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants. Irreparable injury would be caused to the Plaintiff if the Defendants are allowed to continue the use of the Impugned Mark.”

Accordingly, the Court restrained Defendant No. 1, its directors, assignees in business, associates, affiliates, franchisees, licensees, distributors, dealers, stockists, retailers, and agents from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, or otherwise dealing, directly or indirectly, in stationery under the Impugned Mark ‘Neelgagan’ or any other trademark that is phonetically, visually, structurally, or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s trademarks ‘Neelgagan’ and ‘Neelgagan GREAT PRODUCTS GREAT :) VALUE’, amounting to infringement.

Further, the Court allowed the Plaintiff’s application for the appointment of Local Commissioners—Mr. Sunil Kumar and Mr. Rajneesh Jha, Advocates—to visit the Defendants’ premises in New Delhi and Sonipat, Haryana. The mandate includes inspecting and seizing any impugned products, whether fully or semi-manufactured, bearing the Impugned Mark ‘Neelgagan’, or packaging identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s trademarks. The Local Commissioners were also directed to obtain details regarding the use of the infringing products and relevant accounts. The commissions are scheduled to be executed on 10.09.2025.

The Court also granted the Plaintiff’s application seeking exemption from pre-institution mediation, noting that the present matter contemplates urgent interim relief, in light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Yamini Manohar v. T.K.D. Krithi, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1382.

The matter is now listed before the Joint Registrar on 28.10.2025 for completion of service and pleadings, and before the Court on 12.01.2026.

Case Details:

Case Name: Haryana Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Rainbow Paper Industries Private Limited & Ors.

Case Number: CS (COMM) 936/2025

Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia

Order Date: 03.09.2025

Advocates for Plaintiff: Mr. Turab Ali Kazmi, Ms. Hardika Kukreja, Mr. Saransh Bhardwaj & Mr. Tanav Dubey

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Samriddhi is a legal scholar currently pursuing her LL.M. in Constitutional Law at the National Law ...Read more



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-rules-adopted-child-with-unknown-parentage-inherits-caste-of-adoptive-parents
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Rules Adopted Child With Unknown Parentage Inherits Caste of Adoptive Parents [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court held that an adopted child with unknown parentage acquires the caste of adoptive parents and is entitled to caste validity.

02 February, 2026 11:11 AM
ugc-regulations-on-vice-chancellor-selection-binding-state-law-deviation-illegal-sc
Trending Judiciary
UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor Selection Binding; State Law Deviation Illegal: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor selection binding, strikes down state law deviation, but allows incumbent to complete tenure under Article 142.

02 February, 2026 12:16 PM
bombay-hc-holds-section-9-cannot-be-used-to-fasten-liability-on-non-signatory-once-foreign-award-is-held-unenforceable
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Section 9 Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Non-Signatory Once Foreign Award Is Held Unenforceable [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC holds Section 9 cannot fasten liability on a non-signatory once a foreign arbitral award is held unenforceable against it.

02 February, 2026 12:21 PM
madras-hc-bans-construction-at-heritage-temples-across-tamil-nadu-until-heritage-commission-is-formed
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bans Construction at Heritage Temples Across Tamil Nadu Until Heritage Commission Is Formed [Read Order]

Madras High Court bans civil construction at heritage temples across Tamil Nadu until the State Heritage Commission is constituted and becomes functional.

02 February, 2026 12:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email