38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, May 30, 2024

Delhi HC Refuses To Issue Notice To The Centre In A PIL Seeking Decriminalization Of Cannabis

By LawStreet News Network      26 August, 2019 01:13 PM      0 Comments

The Delhi High Court has refused to issue notice to the Central Government in a public interest litigation petition seeking decriminalization of cannabis.

Senior Advocate Aravind Datar, appearing for the petitioners, submitted before the Division Bench of Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Hari Shankar that cannabis was legal in India until 1985, however, the Indian government imposed a ban on cannabis following the United States of America ban on the substance.

He argued that the recent report by the United Nations has stated that the findings on which cannabis was banned in the USA is scientifically flawed. Post that report, 24 states in Europe, United Kingdom and 33 States in the US itself have decriminalized the use of cannabis.

Datar highlighted that there are two kinds of cannabis - one that serves a medical purpose, and the other which is used for recreation. However, the government just relied upon that US report that had come out in the 1980s to put a blanket ban on cannabis.

He also cited judgments in Sabarimala, Adultery case and Navtej Jauhar to argue that, 'when the foundation of the crime doesn't exist, how can the crime be allowed to be in force'.

Datar also questioned the decision of the government to bring about amendments in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, through the route of Finance Act. 'What does NDPS have to do with finances', he questioned. Therefore, Datar had asked for a notice to be issued to the government to file an affidavit.

Counsel for the government, on the other hand, mentioned that they have not banned cannabis but they have put a regulatory mechanism for it.

The Bench, however, refused the plea of Datar to issue a notice to the government. 'If you're prepared, you should argue. We can't issue notice to government just because you want more time', the Bench noted.

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
AAP Minister Atishi summoned by Delhi Court in BJP defamation case, to appear on Jun 29

A Delhi Court has summoned Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Minister Atishi in a defamation case by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson Praveen Shankar Kapoor.

29 May, 2024 12:44 PM
Trending Judiciary
Sikkim High Court Announces Menstrual Leave for Female Employees [Read Order]

Sikkim High Court grants 2-3 days of menstrual leave monthly to female employees, requiring Medical Officer approval, without deducting from regular leave accounts.

29 May, 2024 01:15 PM


Trending Events & Opportunity
LIVE Coverage: In-Depth Exploration of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) at DHCBA Lecture Series [Watch Live]

LIVE Coverage: DHCBA Lecture Series explores the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 with Justice Bhambhani & Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta. Tune in at 5pm on LawStreet Journal!

24 May, 2024 11:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
BJP Moves Supreme Court Against Calcutta High Court's Ban on "Derogatory" Ads Targeting TMC

BJP moves Supreme Court against Calcutta High Court order banning "derogatory" ads targeting TMC during Lok Sabha elections, seeks urgent hearing.

24 May, 2024 12:12 PM
Trending Judiciary
Demand Notice via courier valid in cheque bounce cases: Allahabad High Court [Read Order]

Allahabad HC rules demand notices via courier valid for cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, but service presumption needs registered post amendment.

24 May, 2024 01:44 PM
Trending Judiciary
'Can't interrupt in between polls,' SC declines to consider plea for uploading voters turnout data

SC declines plea to upload voter turnout data during ongoing polls, citing the need to avoid interruptions and uphold electoral integrity, pending further examination.

24 May, 2024 02:06 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email