38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 30, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Removes Requirement Of Joint Proposal By Senior Advocates For Senior Designation [Read Notice]

By LawStreet News Network      20 August, 2019 04:08 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Removes Requirement Of Joint Proposal By Senior Advocates For Senior Designation [Read Notice]

The Full Court of the Delhi High Court on August 1, 2019, has taken a decision to remove the pre-requisite of joint proposal by three senior advocates for a lawyer to apply for Senior designation.

A Public Notice subsequently published to this effect on August 14, 2019, calls for all eligible and desirous advocates to apply for the said position to the Secretariat of the Committee by 4.30 PM on August 31, 2019.

It also clarifies that the Advocates who have already applied with the recommendation of three Senior Advocates need not apply again.

Earlier, a Division Bench comprising of former Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and JusticeAnup J. Bhambhani had stayed the operation of Rule 7 of the High Court of Delhi Designation of Senior Advocate Rules 2018, insofar as it called for a joint proposal by three Senior Advocates for a lawyer to apply for Senior designation. The order was passed on a petition filed by advocates Nandita Rao and Farrukh Rasheed challenging the requirement of a joint proposal for the Senior gown.

The Petitioners had contended that "the said entry barrier to apply for senior designation is in violation of provisions of Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act and also of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution and further it is in violation of judgment of Supreme Court in case titled Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India.

As per the Public Notice, Rule 7 of the High Court of Delhi Designation of Senior Advocate Rules 2018shall now read as under:

"(7) Procedure for designation of an Advocate as Senior Advocate. An advocate may be considered by the High Court for being designated as Senior Advocate either (A) SuoMotu by the High Court. or (B) on an application by an Advocate.

  • Procedure Suo Motu:
  1. An Advocate who fulfils the eligibility conditions prescribed hereinbefore, may be considered suo moto by the High Court for being designated as a Senior Advocate either on the written proposal of a Judge of the High Court or of Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the High Court. 
  2.  Such written proposal of a Judge or of Hon'ble the Chief Justice shall be sent to the Registrar General who shall forward it to the Secretariat after obtaining a consent-cum personal information sheet (Annexure-A to these Rules) duly filled in and signed by the Advocate concerned.

7(B) Procedure on application by an Advocate:

Any Advocate who fulfils the eligibility conditions prescribed hereinbefore may submit a written application for being designated as Senior Advocate to the Registrar General who shall forward it to the Secretariat after obtaining a consent-cum-personal information sheet (Annexure-A to these Rules) duly filled in and signed by the Advocate concerned."

[Read Notice]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

TOP STORIES

bhagavad-gita-not-a-religious-text-fcra-registration-cannot-be-denied-for-teaching-gita-and-yoga-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Bhagavad Gita Not a Religious Text; FCRA Registration Cannot Be Denied for Teaching Gita and Yoga: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules Bhagavad Gita is not a religious text; FCRA registration cannot be denied to organisations teaching Gita and Yoga.

24 December, 2025 05:35 PM
two-distinct-reliefs-cannot-be-intermingled-in-a-single-writ-petition-sc
Trending Judiciary
Two Distinct Reliefs Cannot Be Intermingled in a Single Writ Petition: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that distinct reliefs cannot be combined in one writ petition, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh plea limited to one relief.

24 December, 2025 05:45 PM
income-from-sale-of-tissue-cultured-plants-constitutes-agricultural-income-exempt-from-tax-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income from Sale of Tissue-Cultured Plants Constitutes Agricultural Income, Exempt from Tax: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules income from sale of tissue-cultured plants is agricultural income exempt from tax under the Income Tax Act.

24 December, 2025 06:05 PM
sc-steps-in-to-address-systematic-forest-land-grabbing-in-uttarakhand
Trending Judiciary
SC Steps In to Address Systematic Forest Land Grabbing in Uttarakhand [Read Order]

Supreme Court flags systematic forest land grabbing in Uttarakhand, orders inquiry, restrains private parties, and directs protection of 2,866 acres.

24 December, 2025 07:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email