38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Seeks Response from Center & EC on Non- Observance of COVID-19 Protocols during the State Election Campaigns

By Tanya Sehrawat      10 April, 2021 09:17 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Seeks Response from Center & EC on Non- Observance of COVID-19 Protocols during the State Election Campaigns

On a plea that was filed with regard to non-observance of COVID-19 protocols during the ongoing election campaigning, Delhi High Court asked for a response from the Center as well as the Election Commission. 

Dr Vikram Singh, who is the former Director-General (Police) of Uttar Pradesh preferred the application that reads, "..the biggest casualty during COVID-19 has been the rule of law itself, as strict action is being taken against commoners, but there is barely any action against politicians.

This application is a part of Singhs petition which further seeks debarment of candidates and campaigners permanently or for a sufficiently long period who have repeatedly been violating the compulsory COVID-19 protocols that were issued by the election regulator. 

Singh has also requested the issuance of directions to the relevant authorities to ensure that COVID-19 containment protocols during elections are strictly followed. 

The application was taken note of by a Division Bench comprising of Chief Justice DN Patel along with Justice Jasmeet Singh. They additionally listed it for hearing along with the main petition on April 30, 2021. 

It was filed through Advocate Gaurav Pathak. It highlights the fact that over 40 roadshows and rallies had been organized by major political parties and around the time being, just before the end of the first phase of campaigning in Assam and West Bengal, and then 59,117 fresh cases of COVID-19 were recorded in India, the highest in the last 159 days.

Advocate Virag Gupta who  appeared for Singh contended, "When all the authorities are unanimous on mandatory masking, it defies logic as to why the rule should not be enforced in election campaigns."

Case Title: Dr Vikram Singh v. UOI 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email