38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Seeks Response from Center & EC on Non- Observance of COVID-19 Protocols during the State Election Campaigns

By Tanya Sehrawat      10 April, 2021 09:17 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Seeks Response from Center & EC on Non- Observance of COVID-19 Protocols during the State Election Campaigns

On a plea that was filed with regard to non-observance of COVID-19 protocols during the ongoing election campaigning, Delhi High Court asked for a response from the Center as well as the Election Commission. 

Dr Vikram Singh, who is the former Director-General (Police) of Uttar Pradesh preferred the application that reads, "..the biggest casualty during COVID-19 has been the rule of law itself, as strict action is being taken against commoners, but there is barely any action against politicians.

This application is a part of Singhs petition which further seeks debarment of candidates and campaigners permanently or for a sufficiently long period who have repeatedly been violating the compulsory COVID-19 protocols that were issued by the election regulator. 

Singh has also requested the issuance of directions to the relevant authorities to ensure that COVID-19 containment protocols during elections are strictly followed. 

The application was taken note of by a Division Bench comprising of Chief Justice DN Patel along with Justice Jasmeet Singh. They additionally listed it for hearing along with the main petition on April 30, 2021. 

It was filed through Advocate Gaurav Pathak. It highlights the fact that over 40 roadshows and rallies had been organized by major political parties and around the time being, just before the end of the first phase of campaigning in Assam and West Bengal, and then 59,117 fresh cases of COVID-19 were recorded in India, the highest in the last 159 days.

Advocate Virag Gupta who  appeared for Singh contended, "When all the authorities are unanimous on mandatory masking, it defies logic as to why the rule should not be enforced in election campaigns."

Case Title: Dr Vikram Singh v. UOI 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
sc-rules-temple-funds-belong-to-the-deity-cannot-be-diverted-to-rescue-cooperative-banks
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Temple Funds “Belong to the Deity”, Cannot Be Diverted to Rescue Cooperative Banks

Supreme Court rules temple funds belong to the deity and cannot be used to rescue weak cooperative banks; directs return of deposits to Thirunelly Devaswom.

08 December, 2025 05:36 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email