38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court slams the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) for failing to enforce the Mental Healthcare Law

By Kartikey Garg      24 April, 2021 06:51 PM      0 Comments
 Delhi High Court slams the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) for failing to enforce the Mental Healthcare Law

On Monday (April 19, 2021) the Delhi High Court pulled up insurance regulator IRDAI for turning a blind eye towards non-implementation of Mental Healthcare Act by insurance companies, saying the day was not far when action will be taken against it. 

According to Justice Prathiba M Singh the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) was required to supervise insurance companies and ensure that they followed the law. 

Justice Singh said, I have a strong suspicion that the IRDAI is not taking action against insurance firms and can only do so after a court has issued a notice. In reply to Justice Singh, court said, Whatever it is going on is completely unjust. IRDAI can't turn a blind eye. IRDAI cannot be deafeningly deafen action against IRDAI will be needed in the not-too-distant future.

The court made the remarks when hearing a woman's plea after the National Insurance Company Ltd (NICL) denied her petition for reimbursement of expenses for treatment of schizophrenia on the grounds that mental illnesses were exempt from medical coverage. 

According to the court, the Act went into effect in 2018 and prohibits insurance providers from distinguishing between mental and physical disorders. According to the court, the Act went into effect in 2018 and prohibits insurance providers from distinguishing between mental and physical disorders.

Therefore as per the court, it was IRDAI's responsibility to ensure that insurance firms' goods or policies complied with the Act. Court also said that The IRDAI cannot turn a blind eye to the insurance companies' failure to comply with the Act and asked the regulator to request reports from other insurers on any similar allegations made in the current case.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email