38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 13, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Suo Moto PIL: People Associated with Judicial Functioning called Frontline Workers

By Tanya Sehrawat      05 March, 2021 05:06 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Suo Moto PIL: People Associated with Judicial Functioning called Frontline Workers

A Suo Moto Public Interest Litigation was registered by the Delhi High Court on Wednesday (March 3, 2021) by stating that the lawyers, judges and the staff are equally at the risk of COVID-19. It went on to further say that all these people which are associated with judicial functioning are frontline workers and must be vaccinated at the earliest, with no bar or limitation on their physical conditions or age. 

The court stated:

"The need of the hour is to vaccinate the masses, in view of the raging Pandemic, on a war footing so as to secure the life and health of all those who step out of their homes to attend to their avocations and professions. Courts, by their very nature, are places which have very high density congregations of people on a daily basis. Hundreds and thousands of cases are listed in any given Court complex every day. Apart from judges, the Court staff which is substantial, and Advocates who have to attend to their respective cases, and a large number of litigants visit Courts in which their cases are listed, on a daily basis.

 

This decision to file a Suo Moto PIL was backed by conveyance of the said concerns in a communication by the Chairman of the Delhi Bar Council, Mr. Ramesh Gupta to the division bench comprising Justices Rekha Palli and Vipin Sanghi. This was done on Monday (March 1, 2021). 

The order read: 

"In the light of the aforesaid, prima facie, it appears to us that there is weight in the claim made by the Bar Council of Delhi for declaring all persons associated with the judicial functioning, which includes the Judges, the Court Staff and the lawyers as frontline workers, so that they could receive vaccination on priority, and without limitations of their age or physical condition. We may observe that the co-morbidities enlisted by the Government to accommodate persons falling in the age group of 45 to 60 years, taken note of hereinabove, are serious conditions from which the Judges, the Court staff and Advocates may, or may not, be suffering. Even if, they are not found to be suffering from one of the co-morbidities, it does not mean that the risk of their contracting the disease and suffering serious health issues including fatality, does not exist." 

The communication by the Delhi Bar Council requested dispensaries to be opened in the court premises in order to vaccinate the frontline workers, along with the issuance of directions for the administrative and medical authorities that they ensure adequate infrastructure for the same. On finding substance in this communication, the court took cognizance of the same. 

Since two vaccines are available in India, namely Covaxin and Covidshield, the Court went on to issue notices to the manufacturer companies of both, Bharat Biotech and Serum Institute of India respectively. The notices were also issued to the Secretary and Principal Secretary of Ministry of Health & Welfare, Government of India along with Principal Secretary of Ministry of Health & Welfare, GNCT of Delhi. 

Lastly, the notices are supposed to be returnable before the Chief Justice, DN Patel on Thursday (March 4, 2021).



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-criminal-case-against-paediatric-surgeon-who-removed-undescended-testicle-of-one-and-a-half-year-old
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Paediatric Surgeon Who Removed Undescended Testicle of One-and-a-Half-Year-Old [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 20-year criminal case against paediatric surgeon, holds prosecution over orchidectomy was abuse of process.

07 April, 2026 02:01 PM
allahabad-hc-seeks-explanation-from-mact-officer-over-6-year-delay-in-motor-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Seeks Explanation from MACT Officer Over 6-Year Delay in Motor Accident Compensation [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court seeks explanation from MACT officer for blocking widow’s motor accident compensation for over six years despite Lok Adalat order.

07 April, 2026 02:06 PM
calling-someone-bastard-in-the-heat-of-an-argument-is-not-an-obscene-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Someone ‘Bastard’ in the Heat of an Argument Is Not an Obscene Act: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules abusive words like “bastard” aren’t obscene under Section 294 IPC, quashes conviction, distinguishes vulgarity from obscenity.

07 April, 2026 02:10 PM
cheque-bounce-case-not-maintainable-if-part-payments-are-not-disclosed-or-endorsed-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable if Part Payments Are Not Disclosed or Endorsed: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court upholds acquittal in cheque bounce case, ruling undisclosed part payments negate legally enforceable debt under Section 138 NI Act.

07 April, 2026 02:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email