A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Delhi High Court seeking regulation of content shown on online platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime and others.
An NGO,
Justice for Rights Foundation, has filed a petition through
AdvocateHarpreet Singh Hora, calling for the Delhi High Court’s intervention to clamp down on the “unregulated, uncertified, sexually explicit, vulgar, profane and legally restricted content broadcasted on the online platforms including (but not limited to) Netflix, Amazon Prime Video etc
.” The petition contends that the “said online platforms stream content which is full of vulgarity, sexually explicit, pornographic, profane, virulent, religiously forbidden, morally unethical, depictive of women in objectifying manner, content which is deliberately created with scenes of nudity, scripts containing abusive language in order to attract more subscribers and generate profit
.”
Citing examples of shows like
Sacred Games, Vikings, Game of Thrones and
Spartacus, the petitioner raised the issue of such content being accessible to minors.
“An instance can be taken from “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” where the scene depicting animal (the holy ‘Cow’) abuse is available for view (for viewers of age 7 years and above) on Amazon Prime Video,” the petition reads. Further, the petition argues that such content not only disregards the reasonable restrictions contained in
Article 19 (2) of the
Constitution of India, it also contravenes laws such as the
Indian Penal Code, 1860, the
Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 and the
Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986. The petitioner had filed an RTI representation with the Union IT Ministry to discern the laws regulating such online shows. However, the IT Ministry responded by intimating that the responsibility to exercise diligence lay on the intermediaries, and not the Government under
Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000. However, the petition points out that no such diligence is exercised by the intermediaries. Moreover, it was also noted that “section 79 of the IT Act does not apply to all the online platforms in the present case as a blanket provision as the platforms stream third-party content and also give self- generated content.” The matter is expected to be taken up for hearing on November 14, 2018. Earlier this month, a similar plea was also filed in the
Bombay High Court seeking to regulate the content of ‘web series’ or other programs that are broadcasted directly through the internet on various streaming platforms. Thereafter, the Bombay High Court issued notices to the I&B Ministry, Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Ministry of Law and Justice, Ministry of Home Affairs and also the Nagpur police commissioner seeking replies by October 31, 2018.
Plea in Bombay High Court Seeks Direction to Use Lockdown Fines to Provide Sanitizer Dispensers inside Buses and at Railways Stations
Judiciary
Apr 16, 2021
Shreyas Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
4 Shares
A local Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) has filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court, requesting that the BMC and the state have sanitiser dispensing machines in public places such as train stations, bus stops, and slums from the funds raised for breaking lockdown rules.Other cities' sanitation efforts are also included in the petition. Bengaluru, Chennai, Guwahati, Coimbatore, and Raipur have begun using drones to spray disinfectants on polluted surfaces, while...
“Just Because Wife Died in Matrimonial House within Two Months of Marriage, the Whole Family Can’t Be Held Responsible for Murder": Bombay HC
Judiciary
Apr 16, 2021
Athira Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
2 Shares
The Bombay High Court recently acquitted a woman’s husband and her in laws in a case at hand that accused them of her death.The woman was said to have committed suicide within two months of marriage, in her matrimonial house. The Court observed that the entire family can’t be held responsible for having committed offences as serious as section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC.)A division bench including Justice NR Borkar and Justice Sadhana S Jadhav set aside a judgement dated 29th...
1038 Views
![Bombay HC Dismisses BVG's Plea Challenging Civic Body's 'No-Blacklister' Condition in Hospital Tender; says “Court is Not a Pedantic School Master” [READ JUDGMENT]](https://lawstreet.co/secure/uploads/2021/03/lj_4848_bombay.jpg)
Facebook Comments