38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, October 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Directs Sameet Thakkar to Take Down Tweets Against TV Today Network, its Management and Employees

By Richa Shah      21 November, 2020 01:23 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC TV Today Sameet Thakkar

On Wednesday (18th November), the Delhi High Court directed Sameet Thakkar to take down the Tweets allegedly posted against TV Today Network, its management and employees from his twitter account within 48 hours.

This was heard by a Single judge bench consisting of Justice Mukta Gupta. The plaintiff had given 29 sets of URLs, which were not removed by defendant No. 1 till date.

Defendant No.1 is directed to take down the said URLs from its Twitter account within 48 hours of the receipt of copy of such replication from the learned counsel for the plaintiff, failling which the plaintiff would write a letter to the learned counsel for the defendant No.3 (Twitter) giving the specified 29 sets of ULRs as provided in Para 11 of the replicaation, which the defendant No. 3 (Twitter) will take down within 72 hours thereafter, the Court said in its order.

Further hearing of this matter has been listed on Thursday (14th January, 2021).

A suit was filed against Sameet Thakkar by TV Today Network Limited. Sameet Thakkar operates a twitter handle - @thakkar_sameet as also Aadhyaasi Media And Content Services Private Limited.

On 15th April, 2020, TV Today Network Limited made allegations that Sameet Thakkar had during the lockdown period, published 35 tweets on his twitter handle at one go against TV Today Network Limited and its top management.

Very disparaging and derogatory language were used by Sameet Thakkar in the tweets against the TV Today Network Limited and its management and news anchors who appear on the their channels Aaj Tak and India Today.

It was stated in the plaint that the allegations made by Sameet Thakkar are completely baseless and have also now been picked up by other persons who are retweeting the TV Today Network Limiteds tweets.

The Counsel appearing for the plaintiff, Hrishikesh Baruah, submitted before the court that Mr. Aroon Purie and Mr. Rahul Kanwal- the anchor and other top management enjoy enormous goodwill and reputation in the industry, and making baseless allegations and using of derogatory and disparging remarks against them has caused personal injury to thier reputation.

On 6th May, 2020, the Delhi High Court gave the following order:

The tweets make wild allegations and also used derogatory and defamatory language against the Plaintiff, its management and its employees. The tweets are also very offensive and some contain abusive language. Such a campaign against the Plaintiff, its management and employees can be extremely damaging to thier reputation and also cause personal injury to them and their family members. The tweets are in bad taste and use objectionable language including abuses.

The court further stated, This court is of the opinion that a prima facie case is made out for grant of interim relief to protect the Plaintiff until the defendant enters appearance in the matter. Balance of inconvenience is also in favour of the Plaintiff and irreparable injury could be caused to the reputation of the plaintiff which is a well established media company as also its management and employees if protection is not granted.

Sameet Thakkar was directed later by the Court to use restraint from publishing any defamatory or derogatory posts/tweets or making abusive remarks against the Plaintiff, its management, employees including news anchors and thier family members either through his twitter handle or on any other social media platform or any other print/electronic medium.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-singer-neha-rathores-plea-to-quash-fir-wrt-her-social-media-posts
Trending CelebStreet
SC rejects singer Neha Rathore's plea to quash FIR wrt her social media posts

SC refuses to quash FIR against singer Neha Singh Rathore over her social media post on Pahalgam terror attack; allows case to proceed under BNS provisions.

14 October, 2025 10:57 AM
madhya-pradesh-hc-dismisses-appeal-seeking-reconstruction-of-demolished-masjid-in-ujjain
Trending Judiciary
Madhya Pradesh HC Dismisses Appeal Seeking Reconstruction Of Demolished Masjid In Ujjain [Read Order]

MP High Court dismisses plea to reconstruct Ujjain’s Takiya Masjid, ruling that right to practice religion isn’t tied to any specific place.

14 October, 2025 11:15 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-allows-judicial-officers-with-7-years-experience-as-advocates-to-apply-for-district-judges
Trending Legal Insiders
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years’ Bar experience to apply for district judge posts; ruling ensures level playing field and directs states to frame eligibility rules.

09 October, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-conviction-death-sentence-awarded-to-man-in-sexual-assault-murder-of-7-yr-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside conviction, death sentence awarded to man in sexual assault, murder of 7-yr-old girl [Read Judgment]

SC acquits man on death row in 2017 Tamil Nadu case, citing prosecution’s failure and unfair trial; says courts can’t convict on moral grounds alone.

09 October, 2025 12:39 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-bail-for-forged-court-summons-cites-threat-to-public-trust-in-judiciary
Trending Judiciary
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Bail For Forged Court Summons, Cites Threat To Public Trust In Judiciary [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC denies anticipatory bail to woman accused of forging court summons, saying such acts erode public trust in the justice system.

09 October, 2025 12:53 PM
father-cannot-seek-refund-of-maintenance-paid-after-children-turn-18-himachal-hc
Trending Judiciary
Father Cannot Seek Refund of Maintenance Paid After Children Turn 18: Himachal HC [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that a father can’t seek refund of maintenance paid after children turn 18, citing moral duty beyond legal obligation.

09 October, 2025 01:47 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email