38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, September 27, 2022
Top Stories
Interviews Know The Law Book Reviews Videos
About Us Contact Us
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Issues Notice In Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL Seeking Uniform Banking Code For Foreign Exchange Transactions [LIVE UPDATES]

By Lawstreet News Network      Apr 05, 2022      0 Comments      2,076 Views
Delhi High Court Ashwini Upadhyay Foreign Exchange Transactions

Delhi High Court is hearing a PIL filed by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay seeking Uniform Banking Code for Foreign Exchange Transaction.

Matter listed before Bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla. 

Court: What kind of a petition is this? There is no head or tail. We have not been able to understand…

Upadhyay: It took me one year to understand the problem. There is a massive funding to divide our country on religion, caste and language basis.

Upadhyay takes the bench through bank transactions made by a person sitting in Australia. He claims transactions are in RTGS, NEFT mode, which are domestic modes of transfer.

Upadhyay: Rs. 50,000 crore coming to the country to disturb the society. It's a very serious threat.

Upadhyay: If you go to Palika Bazar, Pahadganj area with some money, they will take some commission. Then they will transfer it in your account showing that it is a foreign transaction.

ASG Chetan Sharma: These are some serious issues and require detailed consideration. We will examine the documents.

Court issues notice. Directs Petitioner to redact the names and share the documents with the government.

Petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, practicing lawyer and BJP Leader had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the Delhi High Court seeking direction for the Centre to implement a Uniform Banking Code for foreign exchange transactions to control black money generation and benami transactions.
Petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has also sought direction to ensure that Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS), National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Instant Money Payment System (IMPS) are not used for depositing foreign money in Indian banks.

He argued that it is not only harming the national interests of the foreign exchange reserve of India but is also being used to provide money to separatists, fundamentalists, Naxals, Maoists, terrorists, traitors, conversion mafias and radical organizations like SIMI, PFI.

The petitioner submitted that the immigration rules for a visa are the same whether a foreigner comes in business class or economy class, uses Air India or British Airways, and comes from USA or Uganda.

Likewise, Upadhyay said that the deposit details in Indian banks, including foreign bank branches for foreign exchange transactions, must be in the same format whether it is export payment in a current account or salary in a savings account or donation in charities current account or service charges payable in YouTuber's accounts. The format should be uniform whether it is converted by Western Union or National Bank or an India-based foreign bank.

"Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC) must be issued and all International and Indian banks must send the link through SMS to get FIRC automatically in case Foreign Exchange is being deposited in the account as converted INR," the plea stated.

"Moreover, only a person or company should be permitted to send Indian Rupees from one bank account to another bank account inside the territory of India through the RTGS, NEFT and IMPS and international banks should not be allowed to use these domestic banking transactions tools," it added.

The petitioner also sought direction that foreign exchange transactions through Indian banks including foreign bank branches in India viz. ICICI, HDFC, HSBC, etc must have information like the name and mobile number of the depositor, International Money Transfer (IMT) and not RTGS/NEFT/IMPS, name of currency e.g., AUD (Australian Dollars), USD (US Dollars), CNH (Chinese Yuan), GBP (Great British Pounds), EUR (Euro), etc.



Tags:
Delhi High CourtAdvocate Ashwini UpadhyayUniform Banking Code for Foreign Exchange Transaction. Chief Justice Vipin SanghiJustice Navin Chawla NEFT RTGSArticle 226NaxalsMaoiststerroriststraitorsICICI BankHDFC Bank HSBC BankAustralian DollarsUS DollarsChinese YuanGreat British PoundsEuro
Share this article:


Lawstreet News Network
Editor
     



Leave a feedback about this




Related Posts
View All

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES


ADVERTISEMENT


Lawstreet Advertisement

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email