38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL To Include Sign Language In Schedule VIII Of The Constitution

By LawStreet News Network      15 July, 2019 10:07 AM      0 Comments

The Delhi High Court has recently dismissed a public interest litigation petition filed seeking a direction to the government to include Indian Sign Language (ISL) in Schedule VIII of the Constitution of India

The Division Bench of Justice Patel and Justice Shanker rejected the claim of the petitioner holding that there are adequate provisions under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, to recognize, preserve and promote Indian Sign Language. 

"In the petition, the petitioner had argued that due to inadequate awareness about Indian Sign Language, persons with hearing disability suffer immense discomfort and discrimination. The lack of explicit government recognition affects the promotion and preservation of the language. Therefore, the government shall be directed to include Indian Sign Language in Schedule VIII of the Constitution."

However, the Bench rejected the argument by referring to the affidavit filed by the central government which highlighted that there are adequate provisions under various sections of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Like, section 16 preserves and promotes Indian Sign Language for the purpose of education and section 42 ensures the access to electronic information in sign language. 

Further, the court also noted that the Indian Sign Language Training and Research Centre has been established by the government to promote the language. Therefore, the court did not see any reason in directing the government to take up any other steps to promote the said language. 

On the question of including ISL in Schedule VIII of the Constitution, the court held that the same is a decision that has to be taken by the government and not by the present court.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email