38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 21, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Directs Centre to Examine if Regulating Activities of Private Detectives' Can Be Done By Framing New Laws

By LawStreet News Network      23 March, 2022 06:54 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Regulating Activities of Private Detectives

The Delhi High Court disposed off a PIL seeking regulation of activities of private detectives and their agencies. It is not for the court to direct framing of law. No mandamus in this regard can be issued. The Delhi High Court stated.

While refusing to issue guidelines in the subject matter, the Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla directed the Central Government to consider the plea as a representation and examine the aspect whether it is considered feasible to frame a law for regulation of activity of PRIVATE DETECTIVES.

Filed through Counsel Preeti Singh, the plea highlighted that the work of the private detectives, investigators, and their agencies remains outside the purview of any existing statutory framework. 

It was argued that since there is no legal governance of the activities of private detectives and their agencies, several victims are being abused, cheated. The work of a private detective, when done without accountability, poses a threat to the citizen's fundamental rights as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner herself claimed to be a victim of unregularized activities of a private detective engaged by her husband, thereby violating her privacy and defaming her in public. 

During the hearing, the government counsel appearing on advance notice informed the Court that the government had introduced a Private Detective Agencies (Regulation) Bill of 2007 in the Parliament. However, the same was withdrawn on March 23, 2020.

Thus the present Writ was disposed opining that it falls within the purview of the legislature, and not the Court.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-judicially-imposed-timelines-for-president-and-governors-on-bill-assent
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Judicially Imposed Timelines For President And Governors On Bill Assent

Supreme Court rules that courts cannot impose timelines or grant deemed assent for Bills, affirming flexibility under Articles 200 and 201 and reinforcing separation of powers.

20 November, 2025 12:43 PM

TOP STORIES

pakistan-transfers-sri-lankan-cricket-teams-security-to-army-after-islamabad-terror-attack
Trending News Updates
Pakistan Transfers Sri Lankan Cricket Team’s Security to Army After Islamabad Terror Attack

Pakistan deploys its Army to protect the visiting Sri Lankan cricket team after the Islamabad terror attack, ensuring top-level security for the ongoing tour.

15 November, 2025 11:52 AM
government-clears-45060-crore-export-support-package-with-new-legal-and-institutional-mechanisms
Trending Executive
Government Clears ₹45,060 Crore Export Support Package With New Legal and Institutional Mechanisms

India approves ₹45,060 crore export support package with new legal and digital mechanisms to boost MSMEs, streamline procedures, and strengthen export capacity.

15 November, 2025 01:35 PM
sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email