38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Restrains School from Using Jaipuria Trademarks, Orders Compliance by July 15 [Read Order]

By Jhanak Sharma      01 June, 2024 11:50 AM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Restrains School from Using Jaipuria Trademarks Orders Compliance by July 15

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued an injunction preventing the Defendant and their representatives from using the Plaintiff's trademarks for 'Jaipuria International Schools,' 'Seth M.R. Jaipuria School,' and any device marks similar to the Plaintiff's trademarks for educational services.

Justice Anish Dayal, presiding over the Single Bench, observed that the Plaintiff presented a prima facie case for an ex parte ad interim injunction until the next hearing. He noted that the balance of convenience favored the Plaintiff and that irreparable harm could occur if the injunction was not granted (Para 6).

Also Read - Battle Over Butter Chicken: Moti Mahal Takes Daryaganj to Court in Trademark Showdown

The Plaintiffs, part of the Jaipuria Group, which operates educational institutions, claimed ownership of the trademarks 'Seth M.R. Jaipuria School' and 'Jaipuria International Schools.' The trademarks were registered on November 4, 2014, and July 13, 2016, respectively. Additionally, the 'Jaipuria Schools' device mark was registered on February 27, 2013. In 2022, a Franchise Agreement was made with the Defendant trust for a school in Muzaffarpur, Bihar, allowing the use of Jaipuria intellectual property. Due to breaches and failure to establish the school building, the agreement was terminated, yet the Defendant continued using the trademark.

In 2024, the Plaintiff discovered the school had relocated and was operating under the name 'Jaipuria International School' using 'Seth M.R. Jaipuria' labels. Consequently, the Plaintiff sought a permanent injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC to stop the Defendant from using their trademarks.

Also Read - BharatPe and PhonePe resolve trademark dispute through an out of court settlement, Delhi High informed

The Plaintiff's counsel argued that the Shyamlal Babu Educational Trust was initially permitted to use the 'Seth M.R. Jaipuria School' mark at a specified location in Muzaffarpur, but the Defendant was now operating under 'Jaipuria International School' at a different location, despite the franchise agreement's termination.

The Plaintiff's counsel emphasized the Jaipuria Group's 80-year reputation in education, asserting that the Defendant's actions were damaging their goodwill.

The Court found a prima facie case and ordered the removal of the 'Jaipuria' mark from the school name and premises in Muzaffarpur, with compliance required by July 15, 2024. The injunction would take effect from this date to avoid immediate disruption to the school. The Court also called for compliance under Order XXXIX Rule 3, CPC within a week and scheduled the next hearing for September 11, 2024.

Plaintiff's Counsel: Rohit Sharma, Jatin Lalwani & Nikhil Purohit

Defendant's Counsel: None

Case Title: Jaipuria Edutech Foundation vs. Shyamlalbabu Educational Trust 

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email