38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea In Delhi High Court Seeking Marriage Equality Same-Sex Marriages States Petitioners Are Like Any Other Couple, Except They Are Both Women

By RHEA BANERJEE      10 October, 2020 10:00 PM      0 Comments
PLEA IN DELHI HIGH COURT SEEKING MARRIAGE EQUALITY SAME-SEX MARRIAGES STATES PETITIONERS ARE LIKE ANY OTHER COUPLE, EXCEPT THEY ARE BOTH WOMEN

A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court by the petitioner seeking marriage rights for same-sex couples in India. The petition was filed by Dr. Kavita Arora, who has been living with her partner Ankita Khanna for about 8 years, thus the petition seeks for direction to be issued to the Marriage Officer, South East Delhi to formalize their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. 

The petitioner in her case states that the fundamental rights give her the right to choose ones own partner for purpose of marriage under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which equally extends to same-sex couples also. Any contrary reading of the petition it is contended that it would violate the equality before the law and would go against the spirit of the Supreme Courts Judgment in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

The petition reads, The law bestows myriad legal rights and protections in matters of succession, taxation, insurance, maintenance, pension, health and marital privileges that are unavailable to unmarried couples. The petitioners are deprived of all the legal rights and social benefits that flow from the institution of marriage as the Special Marriage Act excludes same-sex couples.

The petitioners further submitted that they didnt seek to be left alone but the right to be recognized as equals and to be embraced with dignity by the law. It was further contended, that the Navtej Johar judgment has held that sexual orientation places a positive and negative obligation on the State, which needs to be fulfilled by the State diligently in a non-discrimination manner under Article 15 of the Constitution. 

The petition states, The right to choose a marital partner is a positive obligation of the State to be fulfilled by bringing changes in the existing marriage laws. Excluding same sex-marriages from legislation governing civil marriage outside personal law renders the Special Marriage Act as violative of constitutional guarantees of dignity, liberty, and equality.

The matter was heard by the Single Bench of Justice Navin Chawla on 8th October, Thursday who has directed the matter to be listed before the division bench on October 14, 2020. The counsel representing the petitioner was Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswami, Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Govind Manoharan, and Ms. Surabhi Dhar. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM
sc-declines-urgent-relief-in-indigo-flight-cancellation-crisis-says-centre-dgca-already-acting
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines Urgent Relief in IndiGo Flight Cancellation Crisis, Says Centre, DGCA Already Acting

Supreme Court declines urgent intervention in the IndiGo flight-cancellation crisis, noting Centre and DGCA actions under the CAR 2024 framework.

08 December, 2025 05:29 PM
sc-rules-temple-funds-belong-to-the-deity-cannot-be-diverted-to-rescue-cooperative-banks
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Temple Funds “Belong to the Deity”, Cannot Be Diverted to Rescue Cooperative Banks

Supreme Court rules temple funds belong to the deity and cannot be used to rescue weak cooperative banks; directs return of deposits to Thirunelly Devaswom.

08 December, 2025 05:36 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email