38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, November 10, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Plea In Delhi High Court Seeking Marriage Equality Same-Sex Marriages States Petitioners Are Like Any Other Couple, Except They Are Both Women

By RHEA BANERJEE      10 October, 2020 10:00 PM      0 Comments
PLEA IN DELHI HIGH COURT SEEKING MARRIAGE EQUALITY SAME-SEX MARRIAGES STATES PETITIONERS ARE LIKE ANY OTHER COUPLE, EXCEPT THEY ARE BOTH WOMEN

A plea has been filed in the Delhi High Court by the petitioner seeking marriage rights for same-sex couples in India. The petition was filed by Dr. Kavita Arora, who has been living with her partner Ankita Khanna for about 8 years, thus the petition seeks for direction to be issued to the Marriage Officer, South East Delhi to formalize their marriage under the Special Marriage Act. 

The petitioner in her case states that the fundamental rights give her the right to choose ones own partner for purpose of marriage under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which equally extends to same-sex couples also. Any contrary reading of the petition it is contended that it would violate the equality before the law and would go against the spirit of the Supreme Courts Judgment in the Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

The petition reads, The law bestows myriad legal rights and protections in matters of succession, taxation, insurance, maintenance, pension, health and marital privileges that are unavailable to unmarried couples. The petitioners are deprived of all the legal rights and social benefits that flow from the institution of marriage as the Special Marriage Act excludes same-sex couples.

The petitioners further submitted that they didnt seek to be left alone but the right to be recognized as equals and to be embraced with dignity by the law. It was further contended, that the Navtej Johar judgment has held that sexual orientation places a positive and negative obligation on the State, which needs to be fulfilled by the State diligently in a non-discrimination manner under Article 15 of the Constitution. 

The petition states, The right to choose a marital partner is a positive obligation of the State to be fulfilled by bringing changes in the existing marriage laws. Excluding same sex-marriages from legislation governing civil marriage outside personal law renders the Special Marriage Act as violative of constitutional guarantees of dignity, liberty, and equality.

The matter was heard by the Single Bench of Justice Navin Chawla on 8th October, Thursday who has directed the matter to be listed before the division bench on October 14, 2020. The counsel representing the petitioner was Senior Advocate Menaka Guruswami, Ms. Arundhati Katju, Mr. Govind Manoharan, and Ms. Surabhi Dhar. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM

TOP STORIES

faith-must-be-conviction-not-compulsion-in-tribal-conversion-cases-chhattisgarh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Faith Must Be Conviction, Not Compulsion, in Tribal Conversion Cases: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]

Chhattisgarh High Court rules that religious conversion in tribal areas must be based on conviction, not inducement or coercion, stressing protection of indigenous culture.

04 November, 2025 12:02 PM
allahabad-hc-quashes-false-religious-conversion-fir-imposes-75000-exemplary-costs-on-uttar-pradesh-govt
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Quashes False Religious Conversion FIR, Imposes ₹75,000 Exemplary Costs on Uttar Pradesh Govt [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court quashes false religious conversion FIR, slams police for illegal arrest, and orders ₹75,000 compensation for wrongful detention in UP.

04 November, 2025 12:17 PM
objection-petitions-under-section-47-cpc-should-not-be-treated-as-commencement-of-a-new-trial-sc
Trending Judiciary
Objection Petitions under Section 47 CPC should not be treated as commencement of a new trial: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that objections under Section 47 CPC cannot be treated as a new trial; abuse of process must be curbed to ensure decree-holders get justice.

04 November, 2025 12:42 PM
income-tax-reassessment-after-3-years-needs-chief-commissioner-approval-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income Tax Reassessment After 3 Years Needs Chief Commissioner Approval: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules income tax reassessment beyond three years invalid without approval from top authority under new regime, ensuring taxpayer safeguards.

04 November, 2025 12:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email