38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

"File An Affidavit In 4 Weeks Or Pay Rs. 10 Lakhs," Delhi HC Warns Twitter On Disclosure Of Hyderabad Rape Victim's Identity

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2020 02:02 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Warns Twitter

The Delhi High Court on February 12, 2020 warned Twitter to respond to the petition, seeking action against media for revealing the identity of the rape victim in the Hyderabad rape case last year. If it fails to do so it could face costs up to Rs. 10 lakhs. 

A bench comprising Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the social media platform, Twitter to file an affidavit stating that this act will not be repeated. "If an affidavit is not being filed, costs will be imposed," said the bench. 

The bench also said that a cost of Rs. 10 lakhs was imposed in a similar matter by the High Court for revealing the identity of the victim. The court said that they don't want to repeat that order. Four weeks of time has been given to Twitter to file the affidavit.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on May 04, 2020.

The PIL was filed by advocate Yashdeep Chahal, seeking action against certain social media platfotms, like Twitter, for revealing the identity of the Hyderabad rape victim.

Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 says that revealing the identity of victim in certain offences, like rape, is punishable with an imprisonment of a term that may extend to two years, or fine or both.

It was claimed in the petition that there is violation of section 228A by publishing reports revealing the identity of the victim and the four accused in Hyderabad rape case on various online and offline portals.

The plea has also sought directions to stop the identity of the victim from disclosure on online platforms, either directly or indirectly and by publishing blurred photographs of the victim. 

 

 

Author: Khushi Singh



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email