Observing the voluntary choice given to users to use or not to use WhatsApp, which is a ‘private app’, the Delhi High Court on Monday (January 18, 2020) said that it will only issue notice in the petition once it understands the concern of the petitioner against the application.
Single judge bench of Justice Sachdeva said to the petitioner: "I doubt that you have read any of the policies of any of the apps, you'll be shocked as to what all you consent to, and it is all voluntary, if you don't want, don't use the app. I am yet to understand your concern. Until I understand it, I will not issue notice on your plea."
STATEMENTS BY PETITIONERS:
"The High Court is not going to make laws, if you want new laws, go to the Parliament," Sr. Adv. Rohatgi said on the petitioner's statement that there needs to be a law regulating these apps.
He sought a direction upon the Central Government to exercise of its powers under Section 79 (2) (c) read with Section 87 (2) (zg) of theInformation Technology Act for ensuring that WhatsApp does not share any data of its users with any third party or Facebook and its companies for any purpose whatsoever.
ARGUMENTS BY REPRESENTATIONS OF WHATSAPP AND FACEBOOK:
WhatsApp and Facebook, represented by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Mukul Rohatgi told the court that the plea was not maintainable and many of the issues raised in it were without any foundation.
WhatsApp challenged the very maintainability of the petition stating that users had the option to use the business app or not whereas Facebook submitted that, "The app is completely safe to use. Let the petitioner be reassured that all chats between friends, relatives, etc will be encrypted and safe."
The judge asked the petitioner to elaborate its concerns against the app but even after hearing the arguments of the petitioner, the court said that it could not understand what data would be leaked according to the petitioner.The court further said that since the issue requires consideration, it will be listed again on January 25, 2020 due to paucity of time on the said day of the hearing.