38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi LG Defends Termination of 437 Consultants, Fellows, and Researchers, Citing Flouted Reservation Policy and Revised Selection Criteria [Read LG Reply Affidavit]

By LawStreet News Network      19 July, 2023 10:34 PM      0 Comments
Delhi LG Defends Termination of 437 Consultants, Fellows, and Researchers, Citing Flouted Reservation Policy and Revised Selection Criteria

NEW DELHI: Delhi's Lieutenant Governor has claimed before the Supreme Court that a total of 437 consultants, fellows and researchers were appointed by the Arvind Kejriwal government without following the reservation policy, and by revising selection criteria and rigging the process.

Maintaining that their engagements were inherently unconstitutional and illegal, the LG's office claimed those appointed were ineligible and got involved in political activities for the ruling party.

The constitutional authority justified the decision to dismiss such people in a written response to an application filed by the Delhi government seeking stay on the July 5 order by the LG to terminate services of 437 consultants, fellows and researchers.

An affidavit filed by the principal secretary to the LG stated, "The approval of the Lt Governor was not taken, which was mandatory under the contemporaneous law; the selection process was fraught with favoritism and nepotism."

The response also said it cannot be gainsaid that in any form of public employment, the selection process must satisfy the mandates of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution. Simply possessing a qualification from a specific Institution or University or having worked with specific person or agency would not entitle a person to claim public employment remunerated from the state exchequer.

"He/she is required to go through a fair and transparent process of selection according to the position required, which shall meet the constitutional requirements of reservation for Scheduled Castes and other classes, as flows out of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution read with relevant laws of the land, and be otherwise in accordance with law," it said.

The affidavit also raised the question of maintainability of the plea since the issue does not relate to the May 19 Ordinance, related to control of civil services, at all.

It said the Delhi government should have approached the High Court in the matter.

"Merely because the issue relating to the Ordinance is pending here. Such clever piggy-backing cannot be permitted by this court to denude the answering Respondent its right to even appeal," it said.

It was alleged by opposition BJP that most of 437 specialists, fellows, assistant fellows, and advisors among others hired by the Delhi government were working as party agents and some of them were even relatives, brother or wife of sitting AAP MLAs. These people drew hefty salaries.

"The insidious strategy of the petitioner is clear. There is no violation of any fundamental rights here. However, all that the petitioner is doing is taking consistent precipitative steps as a political agenda. Instead of bringing about cohesive administration in the Delhi, the petitioner consistently approaches this court, attempting to call into question every attempt by the office of the Lieutenant Governor to engage in cooperative governance and serve the people of Delhi," it added.

[Read LG Reply Affidavit]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-upholds-eds-provisional-attachment-orders-in-international-cricket-betting-racket
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds ED’s Provisional Attachment Orders in International Cricket Betting Racket [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds ED’s provisional attachment orders in a major international cricket betting and hawala case, dismissing all petitions under PMLA.

25 November, 2025 01:03 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-different-retirement-ages-for-coast-guard-officers
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Different Retirement Ages for Coast Guard Officers [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds different retirement ages for Coast Guard officers, ruling the distinction lawful and not comparable to CAPFs’ uniform superannuation age.

25 November, 2025 01:21 PM
sc-holds-defective-affidavit-in-ibc-is-curable-not-fatal-to-petition
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Defective Affidavit In IBC Is Curable, Not Fatal To Petition [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that a defective affidavit in a Section 7 IBC application is a curable irregularity, not grounds for rejection, and stresses mandatory notice requirements.

25 November, 2025 01:46 PM
police-cannot-label-sc-st-complaints-as-civil-disputes-fir-must-be-registered-immediately-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Label SC/ST Complaints as ‘Civil Disputes’, FIR Must Be Registered Immediately: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules police cannot treat SC/ST complaints as civil disputes and must register FIRs immediately under Section 18-A without preliminary enquiry.

25 November, 2025 01:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email