38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhis Saket Court Defers Pronouncement Of Order Of Right To Worship In Qutub Minar Complex

By Shashwata Sahu      09 June, 2022 06:09 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Saket Court Qutub Minar Dispute Fresh Application

A Delhi court has postponed its pronouncement of decision on appeals seeking the Hindu and Jains' right to worship inside the Qutub Minar complex. After noting that a new application has been filed in the case, the court defers the matter to August 24.

The court had put off making a decision on a petition seeking the restoration of Hindu and Jain deities inside the premises until June 9, after the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which strongly opposed the petition, stated that the monument's current status could not be changed to allow worship there.

The submission was made by the ASI even as Additional District Judge Nikhil Chopra noted the key issue raised by the suit was the "right to worship," and questioned how one could claim a legal right to restoration for an event that occurred 800 years ago.

The order in the appeal contesting the rejection of a suit alleging that the Quwwat-Ul-Islam Masjid within the Qutub Minar complex in Mehrauli was built in place of a temple complex had been reserved by the Additional District Judge.



The appellant claimed that in 1198, during the reign of Mughal Emperor Qutub-Din-Aibak, roughly 27 Hindu and Jain temples were desecrated and ruined, promoting the construction of the stated mosque in their place.

An urgent listing of a petition challenging the ASI order to stop the offering of 'namaz' at a mosque near Qutub Minar was denied on June 6 by a vacation bench of the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi Waqf Board's request was denied by a vacation bench of Justices Manoj Kumar Ohri and Poonam A. Bamba, who said that there was no urgency in hearing the case.

A division bench led by Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi refused an urgent hearing in the case last week as well.

Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email