38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, December 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandatory Donation of Plasma by Recovered COVID-19 Patients

By Harshil Jain      07 July, 2020 01:50 PM      0 Comments
DelhiHC Dismisses Petition Seeking Mandatory Donation COVID19 Patients

On Friday 3 July 2020, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition that sought directions to the Centre and Delhi government to make it mandatory for the recovered patients of COVID-19 to donate plasma. It should be made mandatory for all patients, whether quarantined at home or a hospital, the plea added.

Citing the reason for such demand, the petitioner alleged that the governments, central as well as Delhi, are not taking effective steps to ensure the availability of plasma for the treatment of COVID-19. The petition, filed by Advocate Piyush Gupta, mentioned that plasma therapy could not only help to treat patients with severe symptoms but can also be used to treat moderately ill patients and prevent their health condition from deteriorating anymore.

Sr. Advocate Rakesh Tikoo appeared for Petitioner-in-person Piyush Gupta with Advocate Kapil Goel. We have about 60 percent of COVID-19 patients who have recovered. After 14 days of having recovered, these individuals can be potential plasma donors, said Adv. Tikoo. Generally, patients who opt for home quarantine/isolation never return to hospitals after recovering, due to the social stigma attached to it. Commenting on the voluntary donation concept followed by blood banks, he said, We must accept todays ground realities. There is a social stigma attached to COVID-19. Hence, the level of voluntariness that we are looking for will be uncertain, he added, By the time the bank gets it, it might be too late.

Plasma collected from the recovered patients can be used as an immunity booster for those at high risk of getting infected with the novel coronavirus, the petition added. Earlier, the Health Minister of Delhi Satyendra Jain also underwent plasma therapy to recover from COVID-19.

The petition urged the Court to issue directions to the respondents for making it mandatory for all recovered patients to donate plasma, citing that black marketing has been burgeoning during the pandemic, due to unavailability or insufficient availability of plasma to the needy.

To put a stop to this unscrupulous activity, the Central Government may constitute a Statutory Committee to look into the matter and monitor the data on all persons who get infected with the virus and to expedite the process of plasma donation by framing relevant rules along with opening Plasma Banks.

The matter was heard by a division bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan. The bench observed that people cannot be forced to give the undertaking to donate plasma before being treated for COVID-19. This is a voluntary activity, and treatment for COVID-19 cannot be made conditional, the bench added.

The Court said that a plasma bank is already in place in the capital that was inaugurated by the Delhi government on Thursday 2 July 2020. The Court questioned whether a person can be forced into donating his blood plasma, it being a voluntary activity. However, it was observed that a person can only be encouraged to donate his/her plasma willingly, after recovering from COVID-19.

The honorable Court sought response from the respondents Central government, Delhi government, National Disaster Management Authority, and various civic bodies and directed them to treat this Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which also sought framing of guidelines and constitution of a statutory body to regulate smooth availability of plasma, as a representation.

 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-quashes-fir-against-r-ashoka-in-land-allotment-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes FIR Against R. Ashoka in Land Allotment Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes ACB FIR against Karnataka MLA R Ashoka in land allotment case, citing lack of sanction, malice and political vendetta.

18 December, 2025 07:58 PM
delhi-hc-appoints-sole-arbitrator-in-meghalaya-hotels-irctc-dispute-reiterates-bar-on-psu-curated-arbitration-panels
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC Dispute; Reiterates Bar on PSU-Curated Arbitration Panels [Read Order]

Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC dispute, reiterating Supreme Court’s bar on PSU-curated arbitration panels.

18 December, 2025 08:23 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email