38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Orders Status Quo On SRL Diagnostic Trademark in Daiichi Sankyo Case

By Manthan Pandit      09 July, 2020 04:37 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Orders Status Quo On SRL Diagnostic Trademark in Daiichi Sankyo Case

The Delhi High Court (HC) today (July 9,2020) in the ongoing Rs 3,500 croretussle between Japanese Drug Maker and Former Fortis Promoters, Malvinder and Shivinder Singh ordered that no third-party rights may be established with respect to the SRL Diagnostics trademark.

Daiichi has been demandinga Rs 3,500 crore arbitral award, as reported by Singapore'sSupreme Court. It has alleged the Singh Brothers were siphoning off group companies' funds to avoid paying the arbitral award dues. The two brothers are reportedly under investigation by Delhi Police's Economic Offences Division and are being held in Tihar Jail.

Daiichi is also pursuing the sale of Religare and Fortis trademarks as an extension. 

Today (July 9, 2020), the Delhi High Court reported that a firm called Headway Brands Private Limited owns the trademark for SRL Diagnostics. The High Court acknowledged in December 2019 that the trademark had been licensed to Headway Brands.

The holding company of the Singh Brothers enjoys a 99.9 percent stake in Headway Brands, the court reported. HC has ordered that the status quo with respect to Headway Brands' shareholding be retained.

Nevertheless, the Delhi High Court has not set any limits on the trademark 's commercial use. The case will come up for trial on 28th July 2020.

In May, the Supreme Court of Singapore had dismissed the Singh brothers' appeal which sought the quashing of a Singapore High Court order that upheld the 2,500-crore arbitration award in favor of Japanese pharma major Daiichi Sankyo.

The Singh brothers are currently present in Tihar Jail in New Delhi, on the account of a complaint filed by Religare Finvest along with the Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police accusing themof causing wrongful losses of Rs 2,397 Crore.

The Supreme Court of India also held the Singh brothers guilty of Contempt of Court after they violated the Supreme Court orders by diluting their stake unlawfully in Fortis Healthcare. The Court had previously allowed them to redeem themselves and purge the contempt by repaying or coughing up the amount payable to Daiichi.

Furthermore, the Brothers are also facing execution proceedings in Delhi High Court, in line with the order approved in October 2019 clearly directing them to pay the Rs 3,500 Crore, as per the said arbitral award. 

Two former executives of the company, Kavi Arora and Anil Saxena were also arrested by the authorities for their alleged involvement in the said case. The police action against the Singh brothers remarks a mesmerizing, stunning fall for one of the most elite known business families in Delhi and the country.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email