38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi HC Extends Deadline For Filing Reply In Jamia Violence Case To April 29

By LawStreet News Network      04 February, 2020 08:02 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC Extends Deadline For Filing Reply In Jamia Violence Case To April 29

The Delhi High Court on 4 February, 2020, extended the deadline to 29 April, 2020 for both the Centre and the Delhi Police to respond to the plethora of petitions filed on the Jamia Millia Islamia University campus violence. The division bench comprising of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar have given the order regarding the violence that ensued at the University on 15 December, 2019.

Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Centre, put forward that the investigation of the Delhi Police was at a very crucial stage and therefore more time was sought for a reply.

One of the counsels appearing for the petitioners contended that 93 students had given cognizable complaints on the attacks on them and attached visuals of CCTV cameras. He further asked for some relief to be provided to the students by registering the FIRs on the basis of all the complaints.

SG then argued that the matter should be looked into in consolidation instead of filing multiple FIRs for the same.

The Honble High Court had asked the Centre and Delhi Police for a reply of this matter on 19 December, 2019.

One of the petition states that 452 tear gas cannons were fired, in highest ever numbers since 2012. It also alleged that the Chief Proctor of the Jamia Millia Islamia University never permitted the Delhi Police to enter the campus. Further claims state that 52 students have been seriously injured and no medical assistance has been provided to them. Allegedly, the petitioners sought an independent enquiry because according to them the police cannot be expected to investigate the matter being a party to the case itself. Advocate Vinay Garg, appearing for the Petitioner, argued that the police should be prevented from initiating any proceedings against the students. All petitions relating to protests in Delhi were merged and heard together including petitions challenging detention, seeking relief and release of Jamia students.

Numerous petitioners have moved the High Court seeking remedies including forming a fact-finding committee to probe the violence that took place after the Delhi Police allegedly attacked students protesting against the Citizen (Amendment) Act, 2019 at Jamia on December 15.

 

Author: Nandini Gandhi



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email