38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Demo Cars' Kept By Dealers Need To Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      27 August, 2019 01:08 PM      0 Comments
'Demo Cars' Kept By Dealers Need To Be Registered Under Motor Vehicles Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

The Kerala High Court on July 2, 2019, in the case of Kerala Automobile Dealers Association v. State of Kerala has held that 'demo cars', which are kept by dealers to demonstrate a vehicle model to a prospective buyer, require registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioners in this case filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash circular dated 06.08.2018 issued by the Transport Commissioner, whereby the Deputy Transport Commissioner, the Regional Transport Officers and the Joint Regional Transport Officers were directed to take necessary steps to ensure registration of the vehicles kept by automobile dealers for test drive, on the ground that some of the automobile dealers are using such vehicles for test drive for longer periods and thereafter, selling those vehicles at a lower price causing revenue loss to the State Exchequer.

The petitioners contended that the demo cars kept by them for 'test drive purposes' were exempted from registration under Section 39 of the Act as they have 'trade certificates' as per Rules 33 and 35 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989.

The High Court, however, held that the benefit of 'trade certificate' was available only to vehicles which are in possession of dealer for the purposes of sale to customers and not to vehicles kept for test drive.

Justice Anil K. Narendran dismissing the writ petition observed that "A 'demo vehicle' purchased by an automobile dealer at a special cash discount or otherwise is not a vehicle intended for sale to the customer. It is a vehicle intended to be used by that dealer as 'demo vehicle' for a period of two years or three years, which cannot be treated as a vehicle bonafide in possession of that dealer in the course of his business, which can be can be driven in any public place or any other place under the authorisation of trade certificate granted under the CMV Rules. A vehicle intended for sale will be in the possession of an automobile dealer till it is sold to a consumer. Such vehicles alone are covered by the proviso to Section 39 of the MV Act, read with Rules 35, 39, 40 and 41 of the CMV Rules."

"A 'demo vehicle' purchased by an automobile dealer at a special cash discount or otherwise, which is not intended for sale to the customer, cannot be included in the stock list, in order to make it appear that it is a vehicle bonafide in possession of that dealer, in the course of his business, which can be driven in any public place or any other place under the authorisation of a trade certificate granted under the CMV Rules," the court said.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email