New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

By Jhanak Sharma      23 April, 2024 11:15 AM      0 Comments
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated the constitutional mandate for equal participation of women in the workforce, as this is not just a matter of privilege but constitutional entitlement.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala said the provision of Child-Care Leaves (CCL) to women subserves an important constitutional object, and denying the same to mothers of children with disabilities would violate the constitutional duty to ensure equal women participation in the workforce.

A woman professor Shalini Dharmani, an assistant professor in the Department of Geography at a government college, in a state university through advocate Pragati Neekhra was aggrieved with the Himachal Pradesh High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking Child Care Leave in terms of Rule 43-C of Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972.

Her 14-year-old son suffered from a genetic disorder which required him to go through numerous surgeries, resulting in his mother exhausting all her sanctioned leaves.

The bench asked the Himachal Pradesh government counsel whether they give any child care leave or the woman employee has to resign in the event of a child falling sick.

The counsel sought time to seek instructions in the matter.

The boy suffered from rare genetic disorder, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, and has undergone several surgeries since birth. He required continuous treatment and surgical intervention to survive and lead a normal life.

Due to the treatment of her son, the petitioner has exhausted all her sanctioned leaves and the Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972, provides for grant of child care leave, the court noted.

By an office memorandum March 3, 2010, the Union government permit child care leave for women employees for differently abled children up to the age of 22 years (instead of 18 years), the Himachal Pradesh has not adopted the provision for child care leave, the bench said.

The high court dismissed the womans plea on April 23, 2021, on the ground that rule 43 (C) has not been adopted.

The provision for child care leave was deleted by Himachal Pradesh. We are of the considered view that the petition raises a serious matter of concern, the petitioner has relied on provisions of Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 (RPWA)," the bench said.

The bench said the participation of women in the work force is not just a matter of privilege but constitutional entitlement by Article 15 of the Constitution. "State cannot be oblivious to the special concerns which arise in the case of women who are part of the workforce," the bench added.

The policies of the state must be synchronous with constitutional protection and safeguards," the bench said.

The court directed the Himachal Pradesh government to reconsider rules for leaves for mothers who are bringing up children with special needs, and also directed the formation of a committee headed by the Chief Secretary of the state to look into all aspects of the matter.

Having made the central government as a party to the matter and sought its response, the court asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to assist it in the matter. It directed that the report of the committee should be prepared by July and listed the matter for further hearing in August 2024.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

writ-courts-cannot-examine-merits-in-section-16-arbitration-challenges-sc
Trending Judiciary
Writ Courts Cannot Examine Merits in Section 16 Arbitration Challenges: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules writ courts cannot examine merits while reviewing Section 16 arbitration orders; stamping objections can be raised under Section 34.

30 May, 2026 11:37 AM
god-wont-wait-for-ministers-madras-hc-questions-vip-darshan-system
Trending Judiciary
“God Won’t Wait For Ministers”: Madras HC Questions VIP Darshan System

Madras High Court questions VIP darshan in temples, saying all are equal before God, and hears PIL seeking abolition of paid and preferential access.

30 May, 2026 11:55 AM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email