38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 24, 2024
Judiciary

Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate: SC

By Jhanak Singh      23 April, 2024 11:15 AM      0 Comments
Denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated constitutional mandate SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday said that denying child care leave to working mothers of disabled children violated the constitutional mandate for equal participation of women in the workforce, as this is not just a matter of privilege but constitutional entitlement.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justice J B Pardiwala said the provision of Child-Care Leaves (CCL) to women subserves an important constitutional object, and denying the same to mothers of children with disabilities would violate the constitutional duty to ensure equal women participation in the workforce.

A woman professor Shalini Dharmani, an assistant professor in the Department of Geography at a government college, in a state university through advocate Pragati Neekhra was aggrieved with the Himachal Pradesh High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking Child Care Leave in terms of Rule 43-C of Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972.

Her 14-year-old son suffered from a genetic disorder which required him to go through numerous surgeries, resulting in his mother exhausting all her sanctioned leaves.

The bench asked the Himachal Pradesh government counsel whether they give any child care leave or the woman employee has to resign in the event of a child falling sick.

The counsel sought time to seek instructions in the matter.

The boy suffered from rare genetic disorder, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, and has undergone several surgeries since birth. He required continuous treatment and surgical intervention to survive and lead a normal life.

Due to the treatment of her son, the petitioner has exhausted all her sanctioned leaves and the Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972, provides for grant of child care leave, the court noted.

“By an office memorandum March 3, 2010, the Union government permit child care leave for women employees for differently abled children up to the age of 22 years (instead of 18 years), the Himachal Pradesh has not adopted the provision for child care leave,” the bench said.

The high court dismissed the woman’s plea on April 23, 2021, on the ground that rule 43 (C) has not been adopted.

“The provision for child care leave was deleted by Himachal Pradesh. We are of the considered view that the petition raises a serious matter of concern, the petitioner has relied on provisions of Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 (RPWA)," the bench said.

The bench said the participation of women in the work force is not just a matter of privilege but constitutional entitlement by Article 15 of the Constitution. "State cannot be oblivious to the special concerns which arise in the case of women who are part of the workforce," the bench added.

“The policies of the state must be synchronous with constitutional protection and safeguards," the bench said.

The court directed the Himachal Pradesh government to reconsider rules for leaves for mothers who are bringing up children with special needs, and also directed the formation of a committee headed by the Chief Secretary of the state to look into all aspects of the matter.

Having made the central government as a party to the matter and sought its response, the court asked Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati to assist it in the matter. It directed that the report of the committee should be prepared by July and listed the matter for further hearing in August 2024.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER] Himachal Pradesh High Court Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Committing Unnatural Acts with Cow, Said that there is no Criminal History Depicting Pervert Mind [READ ORDER]

without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage of investigation and the period of detention he faced in jail, the Court after analyzing all things allowed bail to the accused person ( Jai Ram). Himachal Pradesh High Court, Grant Bail, Justice Anup Chitrakara

How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.? How the Waqf Board has the third largest ownership of land after the Indian Railways and the Defense Dept.?

SHO Bhardwaj was quick to defend the Maulvi in questioning regarding the Mazar but harassed the reported who sought truth. Why did the SHO have to harass a Media reporter when he was doing his job? Who benefits from this? Why is there a Mazar on a flyover? Why is a Minority Welfare development Board in control of so much property? || #Mazar #SHOBhardwaj #Mazar #Mosque #WaqfBoard #Islam #News #Waqf #RemoveSHOBharadwaj

TRENDING NEWS

no-legal-mandate-for-uploading-of-form-17c-on-website-or-handing-over-to-anyone-other-than-candidate-or-agent-ec-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
No legal mandate for uploading of Form 17C on website or handing over to anyone other than candidate or agent, EC tells SC

EC tells SC there's no legal mandate to upload Form 17C on websites or provide it to anyone other than candidates or agents, citing risks of misuse and mistrust.

23 May, 2024 11:28 AM
national-security-always-paramount-sc-cancels-bail-of-pfi-members
Trending Judiciary
'National security always paramount,' SC cancels bail of PFI members [Read Judgment]

SC emphasizes national security, cancels bail of eight PFI members, stressing balance between civil liberties and counter-terrorism under UAPA.

23 May, 2024 12:05 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notice-to-ec-on-plea-by-adr-for-release-of-voters-turnout-data
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC on plea by ADR for release of voters turnout data

SC issues notice to EC on ADR plea to release voter turnout data. SC demands EC to disclose vote counts within 48 hours after each phase of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls.

18 May, 2024 11:16 AM
recovered-direct-chats-between-kejriwal-and-hawala-operators-on-transfer-of-money-ed-claims-before-sc
Trending Judiciary
Recovered direct chats between Kejriwal and hawala operators on transfer of money, ED claims before SC

ED claims to have recovered direct chats between Kejriwal and hawala operators on money transfer in Delhi liquor policy scam; SC reserves judgement on arrest appeal.

18 May, 2024 11:47 AM
delhi-hc-refuses-jackie-shroff-interim-relief-against-youtuber-unfilteredthugesh-for-alleged-personality-rights-infringement
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC refuses Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for using "Thug Life" in video on Shroff

The Delhi High Court has refused Jackie Shroff interim relief against Youtuber 'UnfilteredThugesh' for alleged personality rights' infringement.

18 May, 2024 05:20 PM
abuse-under-sc-st-act-has-to-be-in-public-view-to-make-out-offence-sc
Trending Judiciary
Abuse under SC/ST Act has to be in public view to make out offence: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules abuse under SC/ST Act must be in public view. Case involves Olympic Riding and Equestrian Academy, highlighting key requirements for the offence.

18 May, 2024 05:45 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email