38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Denying of health insurance policies to individuals with genetic disorder is discriminatory: Delhi HC

By LawStreet News Network      27 February, 2018 12:51 PM      0 Comments

In a landmark ruling that will grant relief to all those individuals who are denied health insurance cover on the grounds of genetic disorder, the Delhi High Court on Monday has ruled that right to health insurance is an integral part of the right to health and healthcare under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Making any discrimination in health insurance policies against individuals with genetic disorders as unconstitutional.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh while delivering the judgment has said that "a person suffering from a genetic disorder needed medical insurance as much as other and that the exclusionary clause of genetic disorders in the insurance policy, is too broad, ambiguous and discriminatory  hence violative of Article 14 of the Constitution."

Further, Justice Singh taking note of the fact that there are different types of genetic disorders and even common diseases could be included in the broad definition, she remarked that "in effect, it would mean that large swathes of population would be excluded from availing health insurance which could have a negative impact on the health of a country."

The Court has directed the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India (IRDA) to re-look at the exclusionary clause in the insurance policies and ensure that there is no discrimination against the individuals suffering from a genetic disorder.

The High Court's ruling came on a petition filed by United India Insurance Company Limited Challenging the order of the Trial Court, which directed the Company to honour the medical claim of a person suffering from a genetic disorder.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email