38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, December 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Denying of health insurance policies to individuals with genetic disorder is discriminatory: Delhi HC

By LawStreet News Network      27 February, 2018 12:51 PM      0 Comments

In a landmark ruling that will grant relief to all those individuals who are denied health insurance cover on the grounds of genetic disorder, the Delhi High Court on Monday has ruled that right to health insurance is an integral part of the right to health and healthcare under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Making any discrimination in health insurance policies against individuals with genetic disorders as unconstitutional.

Justice Prathiba M. Singh while delivering the judgment has said that "a person suffering from a genetic disorder needed medical insurance as much as other and that the exclusionary clause of genetic disorders in the insurance policy, is too broad, ambiguous and discriminatory  hence violative of Article 14 of the Constitution."

Further, Justice Singh taking note of the fact that there are different types of genetic disorders and even common diseases could be included in the broad definition, she remarked that "in effect, it would mean that large swathes of population would be excluded from availing health insurance which could have a negative impact on the health of a country."

The Court has directed the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India (IRDA) to re-look at the exclusionary clause in the insurance policies and ensure that there is no discrimination against the individuals suffering from a genetic disorder.

The High Court's ruling came on a petition filed by United India Insurance Company Limited Challenging the order of the Trial Court, which directed the Company to honour the medical claim of a person suffering from a genetic disorder.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-quashes-fir-against-r-ashoka-in-land-allotment-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes FIR Against R. Ashoka in Land Allotment Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes ACB FIR against Karnataka MLA R Ashoka in land allotment case, citing lack of sanction, malice and political vendetta.

18 December, 2025 07:58 PM
delhi-hc-appoints-sole-arbitrator-in-meghalaya-hotels-irctc-dispute-reiterates-bar-on-psu-curated-arbitration-panels
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC Dispute; Reiterates Bar on PSU-Curated Arbitration Panels [Read Order]

Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in Meghalaya Hotels–IRCTC dispute, reiterating Supreme Court’s bar on PSU-curated arbitration panels.

18 December, 2025 08:23 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email