The Delhi High Court on August 30th, 2018 suggesting several measures to curb adulteration in eatables, especially fruits and vegetables said that the testing on a vast scale is the only way to find out if adulteration is being done by farmers or retailers and traders.
A Bench of
Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar suggested that the Delhi government’s
Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) can carry out the testing exercise by deploying mobile vans, which can go from place to place in the Capital and check agriculture produce coming from other States. Further, the Delhi High Court also suggested the returning of the contaminated food products to the manufacturers or the farmers.
The Bench saying that “something has to be done” to ensure that people do not consume adulterated products as it can lead to “extremely serious health problems” has directed the Delhi government to file an up-to-date status report indicating details of sampling and testing carried out by the
Food SafetyInspectors. The matter has been listed for further hearing on September 27, 2018.
Delhi High Court grants permission for up to 50 people to perform Namaz at the Nizamuddin Markaz Masjid during Ramadan
Judiciary
Apr 19, 2021
Shreyas Nair
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
2 Shares
The Delhi High Court today allowed up to 50 people to offer namaz five times a day in Bangley Wali Masjid of Nizamuddin Markaz in Delhi, which has been closed since (March 23, 2020) last year due to several FIRs against a Tablighi Jamat congregation amid the Covid-19 pandemic due to the lack of any affidavit clarifying the Centre's and Delhi Police's positions on the issue as ordered by the court earlier.On a case brought by the Delhi Waqf Board requesting permission to hold prayers during...
Law Firm’s Plea for Termination of Senior Associate Dismissed by Delhi HC with Rs. 35,000 in costs
Legal Insiders
Apr 16, 2021
Tanya Sehrawat
(
Editor: Ekta Joshi
)
32 Shares
A Law firm had filed a plea in the Delhi High Court against its Senior Associate who wanted to resign. Instead of accepting her resignation, the firm terminated her services instead. The Court dismissed the same and imposed the penalty of Rs 35,000. A single-judge Bench of Justice Navin Chawla passed the order. The order ofAdditional Senior Civil Judge was challenged by the firm, Banana IP Counsels LLP, in which its application was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil...
181 Views
![Nizamuddin Markaz Can be Opened for Ramadan Subject to COVID19 Protocols, Center to Delhi High Court [READ ORDER]](https://lawstreet.co/secure/uploads/2021/04/lj_3728_delhi.jpg)
Facebook Comments