38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Deterioration in patient's condition not necessarily sign of medical negligence: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      26 October, 2024 04:59 PM      0 Comments
Deterioration in patients condition not necessarily sign of medical negligence SC

NEW DELHI: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Friday said deterioration in patient's condition post-surgery is not necessarily a sign of some medical negligence.

The top court said every failure of surgery or no positive response to treatment can't be termed as medical negligence unless it is established that the doctor failed to exercise the due skill possessed by him in discharging of his duties.

A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Pankaj Mithal said when reasonable care, expected of the medical professional, is extended or rendered to the patient, it would not be a case for actionable negligence.

"A simple lack of care, an error of judgment or an accident is not sufficient proof of negligence on part of the medical professional so long as the doctor follows the acceptable practice of the medical profession in discharge of his duties," the bench said.

The court set aside a 2011 order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which directed a doctor and the hospital to pay Rs 3 lakh as compensation and Rs 50,000 as cost to complainant Jaswinder Singh and his father for negligence.

The bench here allowed an appeal filed by Dr Neeraj Sud and the prestigious Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Chandigarh.

Rejecting the plea by the complainant, the bench found no evidence was produced of any expert body in the medical field to prove that requisite skill possessed by Dr Sood was not exercised by him in discharge of his duties.

The bench said a doctor cannot be held liable for negligence merely because a better alternative treatment or course of treatment was available or that more skilled doctors were there who could have administered better treatment.

It also said a medical professional may be held liable for negligence only when he is not possessed with the requisite qualification or skill or when he fails to exercise reasonable skill which he possesses in giving the treatment.

As per the consumer complaint, a surgery was performed on the 6-year-old boy for the physical deformity diagnosed as PTOSIS, drooping eyelid in 1996. However, instead of any improvement, the condition of the eye further deteriorated post-surgery.

"Deterioration of the condition of the patient post-surgery is not necessarily indicative or suggestive of the fact that the surgery performed or the treatment given to the patient was not proper or inappropriate or that there was some negligence in administering the same. In case of surgery or such treatment, it is not necessary that in every case the condition of the patient would improve and the surgery is successful to the satisfaction of the patient," the bench said.

The bench opined it is very much possible that in some rare cases complications of such nature arise but that by itself does not establish any actionable negligence on part of the medical expert.

The doctor and the institute contended complainant was given proper treatment with due care during operation and that the correction and reoccurrence of PTOSIS is a common complication of congenital ptosis which could have been set right by repeat surgery. The patient was not examined by Dr Sud after January, 1997 as he was taken for treatment to Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Delhi and Dr Daljit Singh Hospital, Amritsar, they said.

During the period 1994-1996 when he was a Senior Resident at PGI, the doctor was associated with about 74 PTOSIS operations, they said. They also claimed Sud is a qualified post-graduate in ophthalmology. He had three years of experience in eye surgeries including surgery of PTOSIS. 

 [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-court-rejects-plea-against-ayodhya-judgment-slaps-6-lakh-costs-on-advocate-mehmood-pracha
Trending Judiciary
Delhi Court Rejects Plea Against Ayodhya Judgment, Slaps ₹6 Lakh Costs on Advocate Mehmood Pracha [Read Judgment]

Delhi District Court dismisses plea challenging Ayodhya verdict, imposes ₹6 lakh costs on advocate Mehmood Pracha for filing frivolous litigation.

27 October, 2025 11:58 AM
cji-gavai-recommends-for-appointment-of-justice-surya-kant-as-successor
Trending Legal Insiders
CJI Gavai recommends for appointment of Justice Surya Kant as successor

CJI Gavai recommends Justice Surya Kant as his successor. Justice Kant to become the 53rd Chief Justice of India, serving from Nov 24, 2025 to Feb 9, 2027.

27 October, 2025 12:37 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-grants-interim-protection-to-kumar-sanus-personality-rights-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-voice-and-image
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Interim Protection To Kumar Sanu’s Personality Rights, Restrains Unauthorised Use of Voice and Image [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants interim protection to Kumar Sanu, restraining unauthorized AI use of his voice, image, and likeness to safeguard personality rights.

24 October, 2025 11:04 AM
orissa-hc-restores-fathers-visitation-rights-says-child-entitled-to-love-and-affection-of-both-parents
Trending Judiciary
Orissa HC Restores Father’s Visitation Rights, Says Child Entitled To Love And Affection Of Both Parents [Read Order]

Orissa High Court restores biological father’s visitation rights, holding that every child is entitled to love and affection of both parents.

24 October, 2025 11:50 AM
centre-writes-to-cji-to-nominate-justice-surya-kant-as-successor
Trending Legal Insiders
Centre writes to CJI to nominate Justice Surya Kant as successor

Centre writes to CJI B R Gavai recommending Justice Surya Kant as the next Chief Justice of India; he is set to assume office on November 24, 2025.

24 October, 2025 07:53 PM
sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email