38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

"You Have Our Sympathy, But We Can't Take it on Ourselves to Collect and Distribute Money": SC on Victims of Ponzi Scheme

By Richa Shah      20 November, 2020 04:23 PM      0 Comments

On Tuesday (17th November 2020), the Supreme Court asked for suggestions as to the relief which it may grant to the victims in the 2018 Ponzi scheme run by Future Maker Life Care Pvt Ltd, involving a fraud of thousands of crores of rupees.

A writ petition was filed by the aggrieved parties of the Ponzi scheme. This was heard by a bench of two judges: Justice L. Nageswara Rao, Justice Hemant Gupta, and Justice Ajay Rastogi.

Justice Rao said, You have our sympathy, but the Supreme Court is not the right place. We cant take it upon ourselves to collect and distribute money. 

He added by saying, In the Saradha Chit Fund case, the Supreme Court had transferred all petitions to itself as several pleas had come to be filed in different states, In the present case transferring all petitions to one place may be one idea, but such a transfer to the Supreme Court or one High Court will not help you. Your concern is money- how is it to be collected? By sale of the property? How is it to be distributed? We cannot take this on ourselves.

Justice Rao also said that the SEBI was asked to look into the fraud by the company, the issue of fictitious investors in the Sahara case as well. It was not asked to collect and distribute money.

A conference was carried on with the members of the bench after which Justice Rao said to the counsel for the petitioners, You have our sympathy, but tell us how to give you relief. Give us suggestions, otherwise, we can not oblige.

The petitioners were given 2 weeks' time to come up with suggestions and the matter was adjourned.

Reportedly, the Telangana police in March 2019 had filed FIRs against the company and its directors for cheating the common police. The fraudsters had propagated a false theme of life turning opportunity to earn income Rs.20,000 to Rs.1, 00, 000 per month and inviting innocent public to become members of their Ponzi pyramid scheme in the guise of direct selling multi-level marketing by selling worthless products such as suit length and edible products.

Funds were fraudulently collected from the subscribers as deposits towards membership in the scheme through a chain of agents spread across India as per the investigation done by PMLA. The personal accounts of the directors, their family members, and other associates had deposits collected through these schemes. These amounts were lying illegally diverted into their bank accounts. 

Funds were also diverted to other shell companies incorporated by the two directors.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-cancels-anticipatory-bail-in-scst-atrocities-case-says-police-reconciliation-cannot-bar-fir-for-criminal-acts
Trending Judiciary
SC Cancels Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Atrocities Case, Says Police Reconciliation Cannot Bar FIR for Criminal Acts [Read Order]

Supreme Court cancels anticipatory bail in SC/ST Act case, holding that police attempts at reconciliation cannot prevent registration of FIR for criminal acts.

16 March, 2026 02:44 PM
telangana-hc-sets-aside-dna-test-order-in-matrimonial-dispute-rules-child-cannot-be-used-as-pawn-to-prove-adultery
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Sets Aside DNA Test Order in Matrimonial Dispute; Rules Child Cannot Be Used as Pawn to Prove Adultery [Read Order]

Telangana High Court sets aside DNA test order in matrimonial dispute, holding a child cannot be used as a pawn to prove adultery against the mother.

16 March, 2026 05:35 PM

TOP STORIES

itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM
sc-pulls-up-railways-over-safety-measures-seeks-detailed-affidavit-on-fund-allocation-and-travel-insurance-disparity
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up Railways Over Safety Measures, Seeks Detailed Affidavit on Fund Allocation and Travel Insurance Disparity [Read Order]

Supreme Court pulls up Railways over slow safety progress, seeks detailed affidavit on fund allocation and says counter ticket passengers cannot be denied travel insurance.

13 March, 2026 02:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email