38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Divisive tendencies on social media should be curbed,' SC mulls guidelines

By Jhanak Sharma      15 July, 2025 01:52 PM      0 Comments
Divisive tendencies on social media should be curbed SC mulls guidelines

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday mulled framing guidelines to regulate offensive posts, observing that citizens must know the value of freedom of speech and expression and observe self-regulation.

A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan also said that divisive tendencies on social media should be curbed and it does not mean censorship, as there should be fraternity among citizens.

The bench was considering a plea by one Wazahat Khan, who was booked in several states, including West Bengal, for his objectionable posts on X against Hindu deities.

Khan had filed a complaint against another social media influencer, Sharmistha Panoli, for allegedly making communal remarks in a video. The apex court on June 23 had granted him an interim protection from coercive action till July 14.

His counsel contended his old tweets had come back to bite him. Assam counsel said he had written, all those worshipping Kamakhya Devi were sick.

The court referred to the reasonable restrictions enshrined under Article 19 (2) of the Constitution under the freedom of speech and expression. The bench said these restrictions have been placed "rightly", and the state government can step in when there is a violation. "Nobody wants the state to step in," the court said.

"We are not talking about censorship. But in the interest of fraternity, secularism and the dignity of individuals. It is not just about this petitioner. We will have to go into this beyond the petitioner," the bench said.

Referring to the concept of content of speech in the US, the bench said, "So, freedom of expression is different, but now we are at the content."

The bench said that having an opinion is one thing, but to say that in a particular way is an abuse, and sometimes it will not come up in court in the context of hate speech.

The court extended the interim protection to Khan till the next date of hearing in about a month, and asked the counsel to assist the court in dealing with the larger issue of self-regulation of freedom of speech and expression of citizens.

Khan was arrested by Kolkata Police on June 9. He was booked in the case for offences under the BNS, including promoting enmity between different groups based on religion, race, and insulting or attempting to insult religion. An FIR was registered against him at the Golf Green Police Station in south Kolkata for allegedly promoting hate speech and hurting religious sentiments through social media posts.

He filed the plea in the Supreme Court alleging that the FIRs and complaints have been lodged against him in several states, including Assam, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Haryana, for certain old posts by him.
 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email