38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 27, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

ED to seek court nod for custody of accused, if not arrested till cognisance of complaint: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      17 May, 2024 01:38 PM      0 Comments
ED to seek court nod for custody of accused if not arrested till cognisance of complaint SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that the Enforcement Directorate can't arrest a person after a court has taken cognizance of a complaint filed under Section 44 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and the central agency has to approach the court if it wanted to take custody of the accused.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan said, "After cognizance is taken of the offence punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA based on a complaint under Section 44 (1)(b), the ED and its officers are powerless to exercise power under Section 19 to arrest a person shown as an accused in the complaint."

If the ED wanted custody of the accused who appeared after service of summons for conducting further investigation of the same offence, the agency will have to seek custody of the accused by applying to the Special Court, which must pass an order on the application after recording brief reasons, the bench said.

The court clarified if the accused appears on summons, he should not be treated as if he is in custody and therefore, it would not be necessary for him to apply for bail. However, the Special Court may direct for furnishing of a bond in terms of Section 88 CrPC.

In its judgment, the bench dealt with a fact situation where the accused shown in the complaint under Section 44(1)(b) of the PMLA was not arrested by the ED by the exercise of power under Section 19 of the PMLA till the complaint was filed.

It said if the ED wants custody of the accused who appears after service of summons for conducting further investigation in the same offence, the ED will have to seek custody of the accused by applying to the Special Court. After hearing the accused, the Special Court must pass an order on the application by recording brief reasons.

While hearing such an application, the Court may permit custody only if it is satisfied that custodial interrogation at that stage is required, even though the accused was never arrested. However, when the ED wants to conduct a further investigation concerning the same offence, it may arrest a person not shown as an accused in the complaint already filed under Section 44(1)(b), provided the requirements of Section 19 are fulfilled, the bench said.

The court also said if the accused was not arrested by the ED till filing of the complaint, while taking cognizance on a complaint under Section 44(1)(b), as a normal rule, the Court should issue a summons to the accused and not a warrant. Even in a case where the accused is on bail, a summons must be issued.

"It is not mandatory in every case to direct furnishing of bonds. However, if a warrant of arrest has been issued on account of nonappearance or proceedings under Section 82 and/or Section 83 (proclamation) of the CrPC have been issued against an accused, he cannot be  let off by taking a bond under Section 88 of the CrPC, and the accused will have to apply for cancellation of the warrant," the bench said.

The court dealt with the legal situation arising with regard to accused shown in the complaint but not arrested by the ED.

Senior advocate Sidharth Luthra appeared for the appellants Tarsem Lal and others and Additional Solicitor General S V Raju for the ED.

The bench set aside the orders declining anticipatory bail and directed for cancellation of warrants with conditions.

Luthra cited the Supreme Court's decision in Satender Kumar Antil, 2021 further clarified in 2022, which held that when during the investigation, the prosecution does not seek the custody of the accused, after the court takes cognizance, there is no need to arrest the accused.

"When the accused is not arrested during the investigation, after he appears before the Special Court pursuant to a summons, it is not necessary for him to apply for bail," he said.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-permits-ramlila-at-school-playground-in-up
Trending Judiciary
SC permits Ramlila at school playground in UP

SC allows Ramlila at UP school ground, noting 100-year tradition, but urges finding alternate sites to keep playgrounds free for students.

26 September, 2025 12:08 AM
sc-stays-hcs-order-on-composition-of-sit-formed-to-probe-tirupati-parasadam-row
Trending Judiciary
SC stays HC's order on composition of SIT formed to probe Tirupati parasadam row

SC stays Andhra Pradesh HC order on SIT composition in Tirupati prasadam row, clarifying CBI Director’s role in appointing investigation officer.

26 September, 2025 07:53 PM

TOP STORIES

calcutta-hc-dismisses-plea-against-bengali-singer-for-allegedly-insulting-lord-ram-cites-lack-of-evidence
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses Plea Against Bengali Singer For Allegedly Insulting Lord Ram, Cites Lack of Evidence [Read Judgment]

Calcutta HC dismisses plea against singer Nachiketa Chakraborty over alleged remarks on Lord Ram, citing lack of evidence and jurisdiction.

22 September, 2025 10:43 AM
allahabad-hc-slams-police-for-recording-caste-of-accused-in-firs-terms-it-identity-profiling
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Slams Police for Recording Caste of Accused in FIRs, Terms It “Identity Profiling” [Read Order]

Allahabad HC condemns police for recording caste of accused in FIRs, calling it identity profiling that violates fundamental rights and constitutional values.

22 September, 2025 11:04 AM
spouse-may-claim-damages-for-marital-interference-by-third-party-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Spouse May Claim Damages for Marital Interference by Third Party: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC allows spouse to sue lover for ‘alienation of affection’, recognizing civil action for intentional interference in marriage.

22 September, 2025 01:06 PM
sc-notice-to-centre-others-on-plea-for-court-monitored-probe-into-air-india-crash
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre, others on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash

SC issues notice on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash that killed 260; petitioner seeks independent, transparent, and fair investigation.

22 September, 2025 02:27 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email