38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 20, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Electoral Bonds Case: SBI's non-disclosure of details by March 6 contempt of court?

By Mahima Katal      07 March, 2024 12:34 PM      0 Comments
Electoral Bonds Case SBIs non disclosure of details by March contempt of court

New Delhi: The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) approached the Supreme Court on Thursday demanding contempt action against the State Bank of India (SBI) for defying the courts directive.

"The SBI has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the judgment passed by the Constitution Bench of this Honble Court, and the same not only negates the right to information of the citizens but also wilfully undermines the authority of this Honble Court," ADR a non-profit organisation which is the lead petitioner in the judgment striking down the Centres 2018 EB scheme stated in its petition.

Also Read: Why does SBI need more time to submit Electoral Bond details?

On March 4, State Bank of India moved Supreme Court seeking an extension of time till June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties.

Also Watch: 

Why Prashant Bhushan, a lawyer representing one of the petitioners said that the scheme is dangerous for democracy.

 

Last month, a five-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, unanimously ruled that the electoral bonds scheme and preceding amendments to the Representation of People Act, Companies Act, and the Income Tax Act violated voters right to information about political funding under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The bank was directed to submit the details to the ECI in three weeks (until March 6, 2024), which would then be published by the poll body on its website by March 13, 2024.

Read more: SC strikes down electoral bonds scheme: Heres what the apex court said

To get timely and accurate updates from the Supreme Court and High Courts follow our WhatsApp Channel



Share this article:

About:

Mahima Katal, journalist with a commitment to high-quality research, writing, and production. Proven...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Electoral Bonds,' Supreme Court to begin final hearing on October 31 Electoral Bonds,' Supreme Court to begin final hearing on October 31

Stay informed about the Supreme Court's upcoming final hearing on the validity of Electoral Bonds in India's political funding scheme. Get insights into the arguments, concerns, and implications surrounding this important legal matter.

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan on the Electoral Bond Scheme and the Validity of 'Socialist' and 'Secular' in the Preamble. Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan on the Electoral Bond Scheme and the Validity of 'Socialist' and 'Secular' in the Preamble.

In this exclusive interview, Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan discusses the impact of the electoral bond scheme and examines the relevance of the terms 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Constitution of India's Preamble, shedding light on how these issues have affected the essence of democracy.

Supreme Court Refers Validity of Electoral Bonds to 5 Judge Constitution Bench Supreme Court Refers Validity of Electoral Bonds to 5 Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the validity of Electoral Bonds to a five-judge Constitution bench, addressing concerns over money bills, anonymous funding, and corruption. Stay updated on this significant legal development.

Supreme Court reserves judgement on validity of Electoral Bonds; tells EC to furnish data on donations to Pol parties Supreme Court reserves judgement on validity of Electoral Bonds; tells EC to furnish data on donations to Pol parties

Supreme Court reserves judgment on Electoral Bonds' validity and instructs the Election Commission to provide data on political party donations. Get insights into the legal debate surrounding clean money in politics.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

priests-who-have-travelled-abroad-cannot-enter-sanctum-sanctorum-andhra-pradesh-hc-orders-strict-compliance-with-2010-circular
Trending Judiciary
Priests Who Have Travelled Abroad Cannot Enter Sanctum Sanctorum: Andhra Pradesh HC Orders Strict Compliance with 2010 Circular [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court directs strict enforcement of 2010 circular barring priests who travelled abroad from entering sanctum sanctorum.

14 April, 2026 01:25 PM
advocate-challenges-punjab-and-haryana-high-courts-refusal-of-senior-designation-before-supreme-court-alleging-lack-of-transparency
Trending Judiciary
Advocate Challenges Punjab and Haryana High Court’s Refusal of Senior Designation Before Supreme Court, Alleging Lack of Transparency

Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Punjab & Haryana HC’s senior designation process, alleging lack of transparency, fairness, and procedural irregularities.

14 April, 2026 01:39 PM
delhi-hc-hears-arvind-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-in-excise-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Hears Arvind Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in Excise Policy Case

Delhi HC hears Arvind Kejriwal’s plea seeking recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in excise policy case, alleging apprehension of bias.

14 April, 2026 02:19 PM
delhi-hc-rules-in-favour-of-impressarios-social-restaurant-chain-in-trademark-dispute-orders-removal-of-social-house-mark
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rules in Favour of Impressario’s ‘SOCIAL’ Restaurant Chain in Trademark Dispute, Orders Removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ Mark [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court orders removal of ‘SOCIAL HOUSE’ trademark for non-use, rules in favour of Impressario in major trademark dispute.

14 April, 2026 02:28 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email