38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, July 15, 2024

"If Unrestricted Entry Into Goa Would Be Allowed, Medical Infra Would Collapse":Bombay HC Dismisses Government's Request Seeking Entry Relaxations

By Nargis Bano      21 May, 2021 12:49 PM      0 Comments

On Tuesday (May 18, 20121), the Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) dismissed two applications filed by the Goa government seeking to vacate or modify a court order directing the state to ensure that all persons entering the state have a COVID negative certificate.

On May 6 2021, the Bench of Justices M. S. Sonak and M. S. Jawalkar directed the Goa State Administration to ensure that no persons are permitted entry into the State unless a negativity certificate is issued within 72 hours of the time the travellers seek entry into the State.

Application for Modification by the State

The state government requested that a waiver be granted for people who work in Goa and travel between the neighbouring states and the state of Goa on a daily basis, subject to being thermally scanned and producing proof of employment at the respective checkpoints.

It was argued that the restrictions imposed by the Court's order dated May 6 were quite disproportionate and caused serious prejudice to Goa residents who wished to enter Goa as well as persons wishing to enter Goa for the purposes of their daily work.

It was argued that because Goa is a small state, it must rely on its neighbouring states of Maharashtra and Karnataka for supplies, labour, and workforce, and that the restriction was harming the state's economy and the smooth operation of industries.

Finally, it was claimed that the procedure for obtaining a COVID -19 negative certificate was so time-consuming that even laboratories all over the world were overburdened in issuing such certificates.

Observations of the Court

The Court noted at the outset that the State had opposed the restriction of requiring persons to possess a COVID -19 negative certificate for entry into the State of Goa from the start.

The Court also noted that, despite its "clear and unambiguous direction" dated May 6,021, the District Magistrates of the two districts that comprise the State of Goa issued orders dated May 8, virtually defying the Court's orders and proceeding to carve out exceptions in favour of certain categories of persons, either by themselves or otherwise.

The Court also stated that the aforementioned modification was "quite a serious and unfortunate matter," but it did not pursue the "serious and unfortunate matter" any further.

Furthermore, the Court stated,

"We do not feel that any case has been made out by the state for us to vacate our interim direction, particularly now that we have already modified our interim direction by granting  a waiver in cases of medical emergencies and transportation of supplies in the State of Goa."

Importantly, the Court noted that it had not barred entry into Goa, and that the only requirement was that such persons, like others, have a COVID-19 negative certificate to enter the State of Goa.

The court added, 

" If a waiver is to be granted based upon such vague and ambiguous classification, then, there will be no meaning to the restrictions directed by us in the public interest.... ( the state) has not even bothered to explain whether it is in a position to verify from each potential entrant whether such entrant is indeed a resident of Goa or coming into Goa for some work." 

Importantly, the Court observed that, on the one hand, there was evidence on record that the state's medical infrastructure is severely overburdened, while, on the other hand, if there are no restrictions on entry into the state of Goa, this medical infrastructure will completely collapse.

As a result, the State Government's application to modify the Court's May 6 order was denied.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Need to develop law, legal education in vernacular languages: CJI [Read Speech]

CJI D.Y. Chandrachud emphasizes the need for developing law and legal education in vernacular languages to make legal systems accessible to all citizens.

15 July, 2024 09:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
CIC has powers to set up benches: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court affirms CIC's authority to set up benches, emphasizing its autonomy for efficient case management under the RTI Act, overturning the 2010 Delhi HC order.

15 July, 2024 09:42 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Journalist Soumya Vishwanathan murder case: SC issues notice to 4 convicts on appeal by Delhi police

SC issues notice to 4 convicts in Soumya Vishwanathan murder case on Delhi police's appeal against their bail. Convicts had served over 14 years.

09 July, 2024 09:49 AM
Trending Judiciary
Why Indian High Courts still have old names despite change in city name ? [Watch Video]

Know the reasons why Indian High Courts, like Bombay HC, Madras HC, and Calcutta HC, Allahabad HC still retain their old names despite the cities’ name changes. LawStreet Journal delves into the historical and legal context. Watch report !

09 July, 2024 09:56 AM
Trending International
What is Keir Starmer’s stance on Kashmir issue ? [Watch Video]

Under Keir Starmer, the UK's Labour Party shifts its stance on Article 370, focusing on strategic ties with India, moving from past criticisms to cooperation.

09 July, 2024 10:04 AM
Trending Judiciary
ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC order of bail to CM Hemant Soren

ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC's bail order for CM Hemant Soren in a money laundering case linked to an alleged land scam.

09 July, 2024 12:14 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email