38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Register An FIR: SC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      14 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Register An FIR: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court in a recent case of Naman Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh has held that an Executive Magistrate cannot direct the police to register an FIR (First Information Report) on basis of a private complaint lodged before him.

A Bench comprising of Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Navin Sinha was hearing an appeal involving a question whether the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was competent to direct the police to register an FIR, and whether such an F.I.R. can be said to have been registered in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In this case, a student had lodged a complaint with the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Unnao that she had been duped into taking admission in an unrecognized institute. The Executive Magistrate, on the same day, directed the police to register an FIR.

Referring to Sections 154, 156 and 190 of the Code, the Bench said that an Executive Magistrate has no role to play in directing the police to register an FIR on basis of a private complaint lodged before him.

A reading of the F.I.R. reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate does not exercise powers under Section 156(3) of the Code. The very institution of the F.I.R. in the manner done is contrary to the law and without jurisdiction, the Bench said.

However, the Bench clarified that If a complaint is lodged before the Executive Magistrate regarding an issue over which he has administrative jurisdiction, and the Magistrate proceeds to hold an administrative inquiry, it may be possible for him to lodge an F.I.R. himself in the matter. In such a case, entirely different considerations would arise.

Further, the Bench noted that nothing has prevented the student from lodging an FIR herself before the police under Section 154 of the Code or proceeding under Section 154(3). Alternately, she could have moved the Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) of the Code in the event of the refusal of the police to act or could have filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Code before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Thus, the Bench quashed the FIR and said that any application by the student will have to be considered by the appropriate authority or forum in accordance with law.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email