38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Register An FIR: SC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      14 December, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Register An FIR: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court in a recent case of Naman Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh has held that an Executive Magistrate cannot direct the police to register an FIR (First Information Report) on basis of a private complaint lodged before him.

A Bench comprising of Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Navin Sinha was hearing an appeal involving a question whether the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was competent to direct the police to register an FIR, and whether such an F.I.R. can be said to have been registered in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In this case, a student had lodged a complaint with the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Unnao that she had been duped into taking admission in an unrecognized institute. The Executive Magistrate, on the same day, directed the police to register an FIR.

Referring to Sections 154, 156 and 190 of the Code, the Bench said that an Executive Magistrate has no role to play in directing the police to register an FIR on basis of a private complaint lodged before him.

A reading of the F.I.R. reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate does not exercise powers under Section 156(3) of the Code. The very institution of the F.I.R. in the manner done is contrary to the law and without jurisdiction, the Bench said.

However, the Bench clarified that If a complaint is lodged before the Executive Magistrate regarding an issue over which he has administrative jurisdiction, and the Magistrate proceeds to hold an administrative inquiry, it may be possible for him to lodge an F.I.R. himself in the matter. In such a case, entirely different considerations would arise.

Further, the Bench noted that nothing has prevented the student from lodging an FIR herself before the police under Section 154 of the Code or proceeding under Section 154(3). Alternately, she could have moved the Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) of the Code in the event of the refusal of the police to act or could have filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Code before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Thus, the Bench quashed the FIR and said that any application by the student will have to be considered by the appropriate authority or forum in accordance with law.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM

TOP STORIES

kangana-ranaut-slams-rahul-gandhis-vote-chori-claim-in-lok-sabha-questions-evidence-on-voter-fraud
Trending Executive
Kangana Ranaut Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ Claim in Lok Sabha, Questions Evidence on Voter Fraud

Kangana Ranaut challenges Rahul Gandhi’s voter fraud allegations in Parliament, reigniting debate on electoral integrity and institutional trust.

11 December, 2025 06:47 PM
sc-arbitrators-mandate-ends-after-statutory-deadline-substitution-mandatory-under-section-29a
Trending Judiciary
SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends After Statutory Deadline; Substitution Mandatory Under Section 29A [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that an arbitrator’s mandate ends after the statutory period expires and mandates substitution under Section 29A for continued proceedings.

11 December, 2025 06:52 PM
sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email