38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Extra-Constitutional Restraint On Showcasing Of Film "Bhobishyoter Bhoot, SC Pulls Up West Bengal Govt [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      26 March, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments

The Supreme Court on March 25, 2019, in the case of Indibily Creative Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Govt. Of West Bengal & Ors.,came down heavily on the West Bengal Government for putting an unofficial ban on the screening of the film Bhobishyoter Bhoot within the limits of Kolkata.

A Bench comprising of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Hemant Gupta was hearing a petition filed by the producers of the film being aggrieved by the communication of Joint Commissioner of Police (Intelligence), Special Branch, Kolkata on February 11, 2019, compelling exhibitors to stop the screening of the film.

According to reports, Anik Dutta the director of the film has mocked political parties and ideologies across the board from the cow politics of the BJP and the RSS, to the Marxism government in Bengal, to radical Islam in the film. 

In an interim order passed on March 15, 2019, the court had directed the West Bengal Government to ensure that the screening of the film "Bhobishyoter Bhoot" takes place without unlawful obstruction. The order was passed when it was brought to the courts notice by the producers of the film that the film was taken off from the theaters following an 'unofficial ban' by the West Bengal Government.

Bhobishyoter Bhoot 

The Bench taking into consideration the fact that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has already certified the film for public viewing has said that "The State of West Bengal is duty bound, once the film has been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification ("CBFC") to take necessary measures to protect the fundamental right to free speech and expression of the producer and the director and, for that matter, of the viewers to see the film unrestrained by extra-constitutional restraints."

Accordingly, the Bench directed the Joint Commissioner of Police to forthwith withdraw the communication that was addressed by him to the producer of the film. It also directed the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of West Bengal and the Director General of Police to immediately issue communications to all the theaters where film was being originally screened intimating them that there is no ban on the screening of the film.

Further, the Bench also directed the state to comply with the order passed on March 15, 2019, and to take necessary steps for protecting the properties of the theater owners and the safety of the members of the public who wish to view the film.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email