38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Failure to consider case of every eligible convict for remission to be violative of equality: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      19 February, 2025 02:50 PM      0 Comments
Failure to consider case of every eligible convict for remission to be violative of equality SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said failure to consider cases of remission of all those eligible convicts will be discriminatory and arbitrary and amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.

SC Ruling on Remission: Failure to Consider Eligible Convicts Violates Article 14

The top court emphasised that it is obligation of the State to consider case of every eligible convicts for remission, even when there is no application for it, in terms of its policy.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan also directed the States to come up with a policy in this regard within two months.

Supreme Court Directs States to Frame Remission Policies Within Two Months

In its order in suo motu matter 'In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail', the bench said, "The power under Section 432(1) of the CrPC must be exercised in a fair and reasonable manner. Therefore, whenever there is a policy for consideration of cases for permanent remission, it becomes an obligation of the State to consider cases of every eligible convict under the policy".

The court said if a contention is raised that relief will be granted only to those who apply as per policy, it will amount to saying that even if convicts are eligible for consideration in terms of the policies, their cases will not be considered in terms of the policy.

"Such conduct on the part of the States will be discriminatory and arbitrary and amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution," the bench said.

The court said in order to ensure that such a power is not exercised in an arbitrary manner, all the states that do not have an exhaustive policy on this aspect must come up with an exhaustive policy within two months.

It can be either a separate policy or it can be incorporated into the prison manuals, the bench said.  

"The power to grant premature release must be exercised in a fair and reasonable manner. It affects the convict’s liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution," the bench said.

Therefore, the bench said, the requirement of recording reasons either for granting or rejecting permanent remission will have to be read into the provisions of Section 432 of the CrPC and Section 473 of the BNSS. Principles of natural justice must be read into the provisions of Section 432 of the CrPC, the bench added.

The court also directed the order passed by the appropriate government of either granting or rejecting the plea for remission must be communicated to the convict.

"If the prayer is refused, he must be informed that he has a right to challenge the order. A copy of the order rejecting the prayer must be immediately provided to the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority so that legal aid can be offered to the prisoner to challenge the order," the bench said.

The court also said the appropriate government has the power to incorporate suitable conditions in an order granting permanent remission. The conditions must aim at ensuring that the criminal tendencies, if any, of the convict remain in check and that the convict rehabilitates himself in the society.

"The conditions should not be so oppressive or stringent that the convict is not able to take advantage of the order granting permanent remission. The conditions cannot be vague and should be capable of being performed," the court said.

The Standard Operating Procedure issued by NALSA (National Legal Services Authority) on the subject of premature release is very exhaustive and needs to be implemented in its true letter and spirit, the court directed.

It also said when the Presiding officer's (trial court judge) opinion is sought as per Sub Sections (2) of Section 432 of the CrPC and Section 473 of the BNNS, he or she must submit the opinion at the earliest considering the fact that the issue of liberty of the convict is involved.

The court noted the provisions for premature release have been incorporated in prison manuals of various States. In fact, in the Model Prison Manual, it is provided that the superintendent in-charge of a prison has to initiate a case of a prisoner for grant of premature release.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email