38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, August 25, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Fake encounter are extra judicial killings: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      29 May, 2025 12:05 PM      0 Comments
Fake encounter are extra judicial killings Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said fake encounters are extra-judicial killings and must be subject to strict legal scrutiny and the use of excessive or unlawful force by public authorities, irrespective of the nature of the offence or the antecedents of the victim, cannot be condoned or legitimised on any pretext.

Any derogation from the principles of due process, even in the name of expediency or public safety, erodes the foundation of a democratic and civilised society, it said.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh directed the Assam Human Rights Commission to conduct necessary inquiry into the allegations on fake encounters in the State of Assam independently and expeditiously, in accordance with law.

The court set aside the High Court's judgment of January 27, 2023, which dismissed a PIL filed by advocate Arif Md Yeasin Jwadder, alleging as many as 80 fake encounters took place in Assam between May, 2021 and December, 2021.

The petitioner cited 171 individual instances, each warranting objective scrutiny. However, the court found barring a few cases, it is difficult to infer that there has been a procedural breakdown or the PUCL guidelines were flagrantly violated.

"The allegations that some of these incidents may involve fake encounters are indeed serious and, if proven, would amount to a grave violation of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution," the bench said.

The court said it is however equally possible that upon a fair, impartial, and independent investigation, some of these cases may turn out to be necessary and legally justified.

The bench said, where the alleged cause espoused by a third party in the form of a PIL related to a specific individual or a closed set of individuals — particularly where the implications of judicial intervention may directly alter or jeopardize the legal position of the victim or their kin — it becomes imperative for the courts to tread with utmost circumspection.

"The danger of an unintended miscarriage of justice or irreversible prejudice being caused to an invisible and voiceless victim or their family, merely because a well-meaning but distanced individual has approached a writ court, cannot be discounted," the bench said.

In such situations, the court said, it is not sufficient for the court to proceed solely on the averments of the person advancing the cause before the court.

"Instead, it becomes obligatory for the court to independently explore mechanisms — institutional or otherwise — that can facilitate direct communication with the victim or their family, thereby enabling them to make an informed choice about participation or redressal through judicial means," the bench said.

The court said the invocation of public interest jurisdiction, cannot become a substitute for procedural safeguards and the right of individual victims or their families to be heard.

"The risk of issuing general directions in the absence of independent assessment is not merely procedural — it strikes at the very heart of the principles of fairness and due process that underpin our judicial system. The jurisprudence developed by this Court over the decades reinforces the position that justice must be individualized where the consequences are personal and irreversible," the bench said.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-by-aap-mp-sanjay-singh-against-up-govts
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea by AAP MP Sanjay Singh against UP govt's decision to 'close' 105 primary schools

SC dismisses AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s plea against UP govt decision to close 105 primary schools; directs him to approach Allahabad HC.

19 August, 2025 11:02 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-ex-wb-minister-in-teachers-recruitment-scam
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to ex WB Minister in teachers recruitment scam

SC grants bail to ex-WB Minister Partha Chatterjee in teachers’ recruitment scam, citing long incarceration; directs speedy trial in pending cases.

19 August, 2025 11:15 AM
calcutta-hc-grants-injunction-to-captain-gogo-trademark-owner-against-multiple-infringers
Trending Judiciary
CALCUTTA HC GRANTS INJUNCTION TO ‘CAPTAIN GOGO’ TRADEMARK OWNER AGAINST MULTIPLE INFRINGERS [Read Order]

Calcutta HC grants injunction to Moondust Paper Pvt Ltd, protecting its ‘Captain Gogo’ trademark against multiple infringers in smoking products.

19 August, 2025 11:20 AM
himachal-pradesh-hc-grants-pre-arrest-bail-to-industrialist-in-intimidation-case
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Industrialist in Intimidation Case [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC grants pre-arrest bail to industrialist accused of intimidating pollution officer, says allegations don’t amount to stalking under BNS.

19 August, 2025 11:52 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email