38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Dispute Is Abuse Of Process Of Law: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      12 August, 2019 06:07 PM      0 Comments
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Dispute Is Abuse Of Process Of Law: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court on August 8, 2019, in the case of The Commissioner of Police & Ors. v. Devender Anand & Ors., has observed that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is an abuse of the process of law.

The observation was made by a Bench comprising of Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice M.R. Shah while hearing an appeal filed against a verdict of the Delhi High Court.

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court judgment which had passed certain directions relating to registration of a First Information Report in a case of cheating.

The complainant in this case had entered into an agreement for sale of a property, the same was registered and consideration of Rs. 54 lakh was paid. Subsequently, the complainant learnt of a mortgage attached to the property with the Andhra Bank.

He got the mortgage redeemed and thereafter, he got the sale deed executed in his name. Later, he filed a criminal complaint against the sellers of the property under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the offence of cheating, which got rejected by the Magistrate.

Thereafter, he filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the Magistrate which remains pending. Subsequently, a writ petition was also filed before the High Court praying for directions to the Commissioner of Police to take action against the concerned Officials for not registering the FIR, and a direction to the officials to register an FIR.

The High Court allowed the petition whereupon the Commissioner of Police and other concerned officials approached the Supreme Court in appeal.

Referring to these facts, the Bench observed that the criminal proceedings initiated by the complainant is nothing but an abuse of the process of law for settling a civil dispute.

The Bench said: "Even considering the nature of allegations in the complaint, we are of the firm opinion that no case is made out for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 420/34 IPC. The case involves a civil dispute and for settling a civil dispute, the criminal complaint has been filed, which is nothing but an abuse of the process of law."

The Bench then quashed all the criminal proceedings in this matter stating that “the initiation of the criminal proceedings by the original complainant is nothing but an abuse of the process of law, we not only quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order, but also quash the criminal proceedings pending before the learned Magistrate in respect of the transaction in question.”

[Read Judgment]

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
To uphold presumption of guilt under Section 29 POCSO Act, foundational facts must be proved, reiterates Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court reiterates that to uphold the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, the prosecution must prove the ‘foundational facts’ beyond reasonable doubt.

16 April, 2024 12:54 PM
Trending Judiciary
Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna offer to make public apology in SC for misleading advertisements

Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna offer public apology in SC for misleading ads, court deliberates acceptance.

16 April, 2024 01:57 PM


Trending Business
SC sets aside judgment upholding arbitral award against DMRC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court overturns arbitral award favoring Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary against DMRC, citing grave miscarriage of justice.

11 April, 2024 11:43 AM
Trending Political NEWS
Delhi HC rejects third plea for Arvind Kejriwal's removal as Delhi CM, blasts petitioner for abuse of judicial process [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court dismisses the third PIL plea before it seeking Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s removal as Chief Minister of Delhi, imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on petitioner.

11 April, 2024 03:29 PM
Trending Judiciary
Use of social media to interfere with administration of justice needs serious consideration: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court warns against social media misuse in legal matters, cautions against prejudicial posts interfering with justice.

11 April, 2024 05:44 PM
Trending Legal Insiders
Two-day conference on April 13-14 on Technology and Dialogue between SC and Singapore

Explore AI's role in law at the India-Singapore Supreme Court conference on technology, enhancing judicial processes and access to justice, April 13-14, 2024.

12 April, 2024 06:16 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email