38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, October 07, 2024
Judiciary

For you, it may be 'frivolous', for the other side it may be a matter of faith,' SC allows scientific survey at Gyanvapi complex [Watch Hearing]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      05 August, 2023 01:46 AM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: In a major decision, the Supreme Court Friday declined to interfere with the Allahabad High Court's order allowing a scientific survey by the Archaeological Survey of India at the Gyanvapi complex at Varanasi to ascertain if the mosque was constructed on a pre existing Hindu temple.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra rejected a plea by Anjuman Intejamia Masjid Committee Varanasi against the Allahabad High Court's August 3 order. The HC had then upheld the District Judge's July 21 order for carrying out such a survey.

The HC, however, had directed that there would not be any excavation or use of invasive method at the site.

Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the Gyanvapi masjid committee, asked if somebody files a frivolous petition saying that there is a monument below this structure, will the court order an ASI survey?

The bench replied, "Even in the Ayodhya case, we gave the judgement after the ASI survey was done. For you the suit may be 'frivolous', for the other side it may be a matter of faith".

On Ahmadi's vehement objection to the ASI survey, the bench said, "Why should we interfere with the high court order at this stage".

We are unable to differ with the view of the high court.we reiterate the direction of the high court that there shall be no excavation, the bench said.

The top court directed that the entire survey be carried out through non-invasive methods and also there should be no excavation or damage to the walls or structure of the mosque.

The high court had recorded a statement of a senior Assistant Director General of the ASI Alok Tripathi that no excavation at the mosque complex will take place.

The top court declined to consider Ahmadi's contention that the survey was against the spirit of the Places of Worship Act, 1991 which mandated maintaining character of religious places as prevailed on August 15, 1947. The counsel said allowing the survey would open floodgates of filing similar plea across the country.

He said it is alarming as they wanted to evict us of the property piece by piece.

The bench, however, said, "It is an interlocutory order passed during the examination of the suit. We will protect the structure ...we will safeguard your interests."

"Why should we interject at this stage? Two courts have held against you....Despite assurance that it (survey) is not going to harm you, you are objecting to it, tomorrow you may succeed and this survey will be reduced to just a piece of paper," the bench told the counsel.

Senior advocate Madhavi Divan, appearing for a group of Hindu women who filed the suit for right to worship, contended that the job of the ASI is to preserve and protect the monument and not cause any damage to it.

"The survey is for benefit of the court in determination of the suit, and not in any manner is prejudicial or adversarial, it can go either way. It is a chance we are taking," she said.

The trial court in its discretion had directed the survey. To interdict the  survey is to disable the court, she added.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the ASI, that no excavation will take place and no damage to wall etc will happen, and stressed that no damage will be caused to the structure.

The bench also pointed out that in Ayodhya case, the evidentiary value of ASI survey was examined and the court separated grain from shaft, and then discarded some findings.

Ahmadi said when you start digging into the past then you are uncovering the wounds of the past, and that is what Places of Worship Act sought to injunct.

Mehta said that the ASI affidavit says there is no drilling, cutting of stone will be done from the existing structure and also no wall or structure will be damaged. Mehta said ASI says it will be done by the non-destructive method.

Ahmadi said the basis of the survey is that a structure existed underneath it 500 years ago and this survey will unravel wounds of the past.

Ahmadi submitted that a statement was made by the Uttar Pradesh Chief minister Yogi Adityanath, when the matter was sub judice.

Ahmadi said that he needs some time to address the court on Places of Worship Act 1991.

On this, the bench said to hear on the Places of Worship Act, while hearing a challenge to interlocutory order, the conventional wisdom is when there is a procedural order you don't go into an issue which goes at the root of the suit.

In its petition, the mosque committee contended that the HC's order is liable to be set aside on account of "grave risks posed by such an exercise which may have consequences throughout the country".

It also referred to "extreme media coverage and communal undertones of the entire issue" when a commissioner was appointed for a survey last year.

The plea also claimed such an examination was "absolutely" against the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

On July 21, District judge A K Vishvesh had ordered the survey by declaring that "wazookhana", where a structure claimed by the Hindu litigants to be a "Shivling" was found during the survey in May, 2022, would not be a part of it, as the Supreme Court had earlier ordered protecting the spot in the complex.

The Hindu side claimed Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, one of the twelve Jyotirlingas, was first destroyed by the army of Qutb-ud-din Aibak, in 1194 CE. In 1669 CE, Aurangzeb again destroyed the temple and built the Gyanvapi Mosque in its place. The remains of the erstwhile Temple can be seen in the foundation, the columns and at the rear part of the mosque.

[Watch Hearing]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-criticizes-west-bengal-for-delay-in-cctv-installation-cbi-uncovers-key-leads-in-pg-doctors-rape-murder-case
Trending Judiciary
SC criticizes West Bengal for delay in CCTV installation, CBI uncovers key leads in PG Doctor’s Rape-Murder Case

SC unhappy over tardy CCTV installation in West Bengal; substantial CBI leads in PG doctor rape and murder case; deadline set for Oct 15 completion.

01 October, 2024 11:06 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-malayalam-actor-siddique-in-sexual-assault-case-amid-mollywood-scandal
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to Malayalam Actor Siddique in Sexual Assault Case amid Mollywood Scandal [Read Order]

Supreme Court grants interim bail to Malayalam actor Siddique in sexual assault case, providing relief after his anticipatory bail plea was rejected by the HC

01 October, 2024 11:11 AM
sc-stays-defamation-case-against-delhi-cm-atishi-kejriwal-over-voter-deletion-allegations
Trending Judiciary
SC stays Defamation Case against Delhi CM Atishi, Kejriwal over voter deletion allegations

SC stays defamation proceedings against Delhi CM Atishi and Arvind Kejriwal over claims of voter deletion, granting interim relief to AAP leaders.

01 October, 2024 11:26 AM
supreme-court-slams-ap-cm-over-tirupati-laddoo-animal-fat-allegations-before-sit-probe
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court slams AP CM over Tirupati Laddoo Animal Fat allegations before SIT probe [Read Order]

The Supreme Court rebukes AP CM for making public allegations of animal fat in Tirupati Laddoos before an SIT probe or FIR, affecting devotees' sentiments.

01 October, 2024 11:42 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email