38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

High Court Of Gauhati Declares Muslim Mans Second Marriage With Hindu Woman Invalid

By ANUSHKA BHATNAGAR      19 September, 2021 11:38 AM      0 Comments
High Court Of Gauhati Declares Muslim Mans Second Marriage With Hindu Woman Invalid

The High Court of  Gauhati in a recent case held that Special Marriage Act, 1954 does not provide any clause under which the second marriage of a Muslim man with a Hindu woman can be declared valid. 

FACTS

Sahabuddin Ahmed who was an employee in the office of the Deputy Commissioner at the Kamrup District died in a road accident after which his second wife, Dipamani Kalita filed a case asking for the pension and other benefits. The petitioner is also the mother of a twelve-year-old son.

COURTS OBSERVATION 

On 6th September 2021, Justice Kalyan Rai Surana highlighted that as per Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 one of the conditions required for having a valid marriage under the Special Marriage Act is that neither of the parties should have a spouse at the time of marriage. 

Furthermore, the court observed that at the time when the marriage between the appellant and her late husband was registered under the said act, Late Sahabuddins first marriage was not annulled which means that he had a spouse. 

PRECEDENT

The Court also referred to the case of  Md. Salim Ali versus Shamshudeen case, where it was held that under the Mohammedan law, marriage between an idol worshipper and a Muslim man is an irregular marriage as per Section 22 of the principles of Mohammedan law by Mulla (20th edition).

While deciding the present case the Court held that the petitioner did not get married under the Mohammedan law but under the Special Law Marriage Act, 1954 however that marriage is void as the parties did not meet the condition in Section 4 (a) of the Act. 

The Court also held that there is no indication that the  petitioner did not change her Hindu name or by any means try to change her religion as there is no record of the same. 

PRESENT SCENARIO 

The Court dismissed the writ petition stating that the marriage is void and hence the second wife would not be entitled to the pension, however, the Honorable Judge held that her minor son would be entitled to the share of pension and other benefits. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email