38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, April 21, 2024
Judiciary

Govt. Servant Is Not A ‘Consumer’, Cannot File Complaint For Retiral Benefits Before Consumer Forums: SC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      12 November, 2019 01:11 PM      0 Comments
Govt. Servant Is Not A ‘Consumer’, Cannot File Complaint For Retiral Benefits Before Consumer Forums: SC [Read Judgment]

The Supreme Court on November 6, 2019, in the case of Ministry of Water Resources & Ors. v. Shreepat Rao Kamde, has held that government servant does not fall under the definition of a “consumer” as defined under Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and thus he cannot raise any dispute regarding his service conditions or for payment of gratuity or GPF or any of his retiral benefits before any of the forum under the Act.

A Division Bench comprising of Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice Indu Malhotra was hearing an appeal challenging an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi.

The respondent in the case moved a complaint before the District Forum claiming interest for the delayed payment of General Provident Fund dues and for compensation etc. The District Forum accepted the claim petition and the State Commission affirmed the view taken by the District Forum.

Being aggrieved, the appellant carried the matter further by filing revision before the National Commission. The Revision was however delayed by 121 days and the National Commission refused to condone delay and consequently the revision was dismissed. Thus the appeal is now before the Supreme Court. 

The issue raised before the Court was whether in respect of retiral dues, a complaint could be maintained before the District Consumer Forum? 

The Court placed reliance on a judgment in the case of Jagmittar Sain Bhagat v. Director, Health Services, Haryana (2013) 10 SCC 136, wherein the law was settled that a government servant cannot approach any of the forum under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, for any of the retiral benefits.

It was observed thus: “It is evident that by no stretch of imagination can a government servant raise any dispute regarding his service conditions or for payment of gratuity or GPF or any of his retiral benefits before any of the forum under the Act. The government servant does not fall under the definition of a "consumer" as defined under Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the Act. Such government servant is entitled to claim his retiral benefits strictly in accordance with his service conditions and regulations or statutory rules framed for that purpose. The appropriate forum, for redressal of any of his grievance, may be the State Administrative Tribunal, if any, or the civil court but certainly not a forum under the Act.”

Therefore, the Court allowed the appeal, further observing that: “On the point of entitlement of a Government servant in respect of dues as stated and whether such Government servant can maintain any action under the provisions of the Act, the law is thus well settled. The decision of this Court rendered in Jagmittar Sain Bhagat was holding the field when the matter was decided by the State Commission and the National Commission. A plea was squarely raised by the appellants about the inapplicability of the provisions of the Act. However, that plea was not gone into. In keeping with the principles laid down by this Court in the case of Jagmittar Sain Bhagat, we hold that the complaint in the present case was not maintainable before the District Forum under the provisions of the Act.”

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-orders-medical-examination-of-yr-old-rape-survivor-seeking-to-terminate-her-week-pregnancy
Trending Judiciary
SC orders medical examination of 14-yr-old rape survivor seeking to terminate her 28-week pregnancy

Supreme Court orders medical examination of 14-year-old rape survivor seeking termination of 28-week pregnancy. Decision to be made after evaluating impact on her health.

20 April, 2024 11:00 AM

TOP STORIES

need-to-safeguard-judiciary-from-unwarranted-pressures-21-ex-judges-write-letter-to-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
sc-notice-to-ed-declines-early-date-on-plea-by-delhi-cm-arvind-kejriwal-against-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED; declines early date on plea by Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal against arrest

SC issues notice to ED, declines early hearing on Delhi CM Kejriwal's plea against arrest in liquor scam.

15 April, 2024 03:08 PM
call-for-chapters-gender-based-violence-and-religion
Trending Law School
Call For Chapters: Gender-Based Violence and Religion

Calling For Book Chapters: As an editor, Dr. Amit Anand, Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, REVA University, Bengaluru, is inviting people to contribute to a book, entitled "Gender-Based Violence and Religion." This book is scheduled to be published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

15 April, 2024 04:21 PM
cannot-stop-any-public-rally-bombay-hc-says-on-allegation-that-ram-navami-processions-deliberately-pass-through-muslim-majority-areas
Trending Top Stories
Cannot stop any public rally, Bombay HC on allegation that Ram Navami processions deliberately pass through Muslim-majority areas

The Bombay High Court calls upon the Maharashtra Police to ensure that no law and order issues occur during a Ram Navami rally in a Muslim-majority area in Mumbai.

15 April, 2024 06:36 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email