38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 02, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Gratuity : 6% Or 10% Interest For Delayed Payment Of Gratuity? Supreme Court To Consider

By Akshat Bhat      29 March, 2022 02:26 AM      0 Comments
Gratuity For Delayed Payment Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has given notice on a petition contesting a judgement by the Orissa High Court reducing interest on delayed gratuity payments from 10% to 6% under the Interest Act rather than the Payment of Gratuity Act.

A bench consisting of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant has issued a notice with a 12-week deadline for filing reply affidavits, as well as a 6-week deadline for filing counter affidavits.

During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Advocate Madhusmita Bora, made the following submissions:

  1. Simple interest became obliged to be paid for the delay in disbursing gratuity with the addition of sub-section 3(a) to Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972.
  2. On October 1, 1987, the Union Ministry of Labour issued a notification setting the rate of interest at 10% per annum.
  3. As a result, the Single Judge made an error by decreasing the interest payable to the petitioner on the late payment of gratuity from 10% to 6% per year.

The current Special Leave Petition was filed in response to the Division Bench's ruling dismissing the writ appeal and confirming the Single Judge's order directing interest on the delayed payment of gratuity at 6% per year rather than the claimed 10% per year.

In the impugned Order, the High Court found that the Payment of Gratuity Act makes no provision for a mandatory minimum rate of interest on late payments.

The Court went on to say that the Single Judge had directed, after reviewing the provisions of the Interest Act, that instead of the claimed 10% interest on the delayed payment of gratuity amount, it would be appropriate in the interest of justice if interest for the delayed period was at the rate of 6% per annum, and that the Single Judge had made no error.

The High Court should not have applied the provisions of the Interest Act instead of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, according to the special leave petition filed by Advocate Madhusmita Bora, because the Petitioner's case is squarely covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

According to the petition, the issue in the case is whether to reduce the percentage of interest due to a delay in granting the gratuity from 10% to 6%, while ignoring the applicability of the judgement in Paradeep Port Trust v. Controlling Authority and others in W.P. (C) 13892 of 2005, which held that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 will be effective as of May 24, 1994 in reference to the letter issued by.

BACKGROUND

The Petitioner was employed as an executive engineer at the Paradip Port Trust in Orissa (Respondent No. 1 herein) and has been aggrieved since 2002, when he was superannuated after more than 38 years of service.

The current Petitioner submitted Form N with the Assistant Labour Commissioner(C), Bhubaneshwar, seeking interest on a gratuity that had been paid late.

The Assistant Labour Commissioner(C), Bhubaneshwar, recognising the application of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, ordered the Pradip Port Trust management to pay the Petitioner simple interest at a rate of 10% per annum.

The Respondent Port Trust filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority, but the Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Bhubaneshwar upheld the Assistant Labour Commissioner's decision.

The Respondent then filed a writ suit in the High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, challenging the Controlling Authority's Order dated 10.10.2012 and the Appellate Authority's Order dated 26.07.2013.

The Single Judge lowered the interest incurred on the employer's (Respondent No.1) delay in releasing gratuity from 10% to 6% per annum under the Interest Act, as required under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The Petitioner filed an appeal with the Division Bench of the High Court, which was dismissed. The Division Bench of the High Court further found that the Payment of Gratuity Act does not contain any clause mandating a minimum rate of interest on late payments.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-questions-justice-varma-over-failure-to-challenge-validity-of-in-house-inquiry-panel
Trending Judiciary
SC questions Justice Varma over failure to challenge validity of in-house inquiry panel

SC questions Justice Varma for not challenging in-house probe panel earlier despite cash haul case; asks why he joined inquiry if he found it flawed.

28 July, 2025 02:27 PM
timelines-for-governor-prez-to-clear-bills-kerala-asks-sc-to-return-presidential-reference-unanswered
Trending Executive
Timelines for Governor, Prez to clear Bills: Kerala asks SC to return presidential reference "unanswered"

Kerala urges SC to return Presidential reference on bill clearance timelines as “unmaintainable”, citing suppression of facts and settled SC rulings under Article 200.

28 July, 2025 02:38 PM
sc-refuses-to-stay-publication-of-draft-voters-list-in-bihar-on-aug-1
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to stay publication of draft voters list in Bihar on Aug 1

SC declines stay on Bihar draft voter list; asks EC to consider Aadhaar, Voter ID for inclusion ahead of Assembly polls on August 1.

28 July, 2025 04:10 PM
why-so-many-students-dying-by-suicides-sc-asks-iit-kharagpur
Trending Judiciary
Why so many students dying by suicides, SC asks IIT Kharagpur

SC asks IIT Kharagpur why students are dying by suicide; raises concern amid rising campus deaths despite new mental health guidelines.

29 July, 2025 11:51 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email