38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, September 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Growing tendency to misuse anti Dowry law, courts must carefully scrutinize matrimonial conflicts: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      11 December, 2024 04:43 AM      0 Comments
Growing tendency to misuse anti Dowry law courts must carefully scrutinize matrimonial conflicts SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said the courts must carefully examine the FIR lodged matrimonial disputes, as there is is a growing tendency to misuse of anti dowry provisions to settle personal scores and vendetta.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh said that the Dowry Prohibition Act, was intended to curb cruelty inflicted on a woman by her husband and his family, however, in recent years, as there have been a notable rise in matrimonial disputes across the country, consequently, there has been a growing tendency to misuse the Act, as a tool for unleashing personal vendetta against the husband and his family by a wife.

Supreme Court Warns Against False Dowry Claims: Calls for Strict FIR Examination

The court emphasised that allegations during matrimonial conflicts, if not scrutinized, will lead to the misuse of legal processes and an encouragement for use of arm-twisting tactics by a wife or her family.

The court also underscored that a mere reference to the names of family members in a criminal case arising out of a matrimonial dispute, without specific allegations indicating their active involvement should be nipped in the bud.

In a judgment, the bench said there is often a tendency to implicate all the members of the husband’s family when domestic disputes arise out of a matrimonial discord.

Misuse of Anti-Dowry Law on the Rise: SC Urges Courts to Prevent Legal Harassment

“Such generalised and sweeping accusations unsupported by concrete evidence or particularised allegations cannot form the basis for criminal prosecution. Courts must exercise caution in such cases to prevent misuse of legal provisions and the legal process and avoid unnecessary harassment of innocent family members,” the bench said.

Dealing with an appeal filed by Dara Lakshmi Narayana and others, the bench noted that, in the present case, the husband’s five family members were living in different cities and had not resided in the matrimonial house of the couple, yet they were named in the FIR by the wife and dragged into the web of crime without any rhyme or reasons.

The bench said they cannot be dragged into criminal prosecution and the same would be an abuse of the process of the law in the absence of specific allegations made against each of them.

According to the facts of the case, the husband and his wife i.e. the second respondent resided at Jollarpeta, Tamil Nadu where he was working in Southern Railways. They were married in the year 2015 and soon thereafter in the years 2016 and 2017, the wife gave birth to two children. The bench said it cannot be believed that there was any harassment for dowry during this period or that there was any matrimonial discord.

The woman lodged an FIR under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Act, against the husband, his parents and three sisters of the husband. Section 498A of the IPC deals with offences committed by the husband or relatives of the husband subjecting cruelty towards the wife. The Telangana High Court had refused to quash the criminal proceedings against the husband and his family members.

The court pointed out the inclusion of Section 498A of the IPC by way of an amendment was intended to curb cruelty inflicted on a woman by her husband and his family, ensuring swift intervention by the state.

“However, in recent years, as there have been a notable rise in matrimonial disputes across the country, accompanied by growing discord and tension within the institution of marriage, consequently, there has been a growing tendency to misuse provisions like Section 498A of the IPC as a tool for unleashing personal vendetta against the husband and his family by a wife,” the bench said.

The court allowed the appeal and quashed the FIR and the trial proceedings against the husband and his family members.

It said that making vague and generalised allegations during matrimonial conflicts, if not scrutinized, will lead to the misuse of legal processes and an encouragement for use of arm-twisting tactics by a wife and/or her family.

“Sometimes, recourse is taken to invoke Section 498A of the IPC against the husband and his family in order to seek compliance with the unreasonable demands of a wife. Consequently, this court has, time and again, cautioned against prosecuting the husband and his family in the absence of a clear prima facie case against them,” the bench said.

The court, however, clarified that it is not stating that any woman who has suffered cruelty in terms of what has been contemplated under Section 498A of the IPC should remain silent and forbear herself from making a complaint or initiating any criminal proceeding. “But we should not encourage a case like as in the present one, where as a counterblast to the petition for dissolution of marriage sought by the first appellant-husband of the second respondent herein, a complaint under Section 498A of the IPC is lodged by the latter,” the bench said.

The bench said the allegations made by the wife in the FIR seem to be motivated by a desire for retribution rather than a legitimate grievance as notice was sent by the husband for divorce as she twice left the matrimonial home and at one time was found living with another man by the police.

“Further, the allegations attributed against the appellants herein are vague and omnibus,” the bench said.

The bench set aside the high court order, saying that it erred in not exercising the powers available to it under Section 482 CrPC and thereby failed to prevent abuse of the court’s process by continuing the criminal prosecution against the appellants.

Qua the allegations levelled by the wife, the bench said she has not provided any specific details or described any particular instance of harassment, and she has also not mentioned the time, date, place, or manner in which the alleged harassment occurred.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-rejects-plea-upholds-3500-aibe-exam-fee-by-bci-as-not-unconstitutional
Trending Judiciary
SC Rejects Plea, Upholds ₹3,500 AIBE Exam Fee by BCI as Not Unconstitutional

SC dismisses plea against Rs 3,500 AIBE fee, upholding Bar Council of India’s right to charge for exam expenses, ruling fee not unconstitutional.

03 September, 2025 11:16 AM
hc-dismisses-plea-for-bail-by-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-case-of-conspiracy-to-delhi-riots
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses plea for bail by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in case of conspiracy to Delhi riots [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC dismisses bail pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 riots conspiracy case, citing strong evidence and grave role in instigating violence.

03 September, 2025 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

supreme-court-appoints-two-new-judges-justice-alok-aradhe-and-future-cji-vipul-pancholi
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Appoints Two New Judges: Justice Alok Aradhe & Future CJI Vipul Pancholi

SC gets two new judges — Justices Alok Aradhe and Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, with Pancholi set to be CJI in 2031. Oath administered by CJI Gavai.

29 August, 2025 02:23 PM
sc-to-hear-on-monday-pleas-to-extend-september-1-deadline-for-claims-objections-in-bihar-sir
Trending Judiciary
SC to hear on Monday pleas to extend September 8 deadline for claims, objections in Bihar SIR [Read Order]

SC to hear on Monday pleas seeking extension of Sept 8 deadline for filing claims, objections in Bihar voter list revision.

29 August, 2025 02:32 PM
sc-grants-bail-to-gangster-arun-gawali-in-murder-case-of-shiv-sena-corporator
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to 'gangster' Arun Gawali in murder case of Shiv Sena corporator [Read Order]

SC grants bail to ex-MLA Arun Gawali in 2007 murder case of Shiv Sena corporator after 18 years in jail; appeal hearing set for Feb 2026.

29 August, 2025 02:45 PM
prolonged-cohabitation-results-in-presumption-of-marriage-sc
Trending Judiciary
Prolonged cohabitation results in presumption of marriage: SC [Read Judgment]

Prolonged cohabitation presumes valid marriage unless disproved by strong evidence; woman’s silence seen as deliberate evasion, appeal dismissed: SC

29 August, 2025 02:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email