38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Growing tendency to resort to criminal proceedings when relationship turned sour: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      08 April, 2025 05:25 PM      0 Comments
Growing tendency to resort to criminal proceedings when relationship turned sour SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday expressed concern over a growing tendency of resorting to initiation of criminal proceedings when relationships turn sour. It held that every consensual relationship, where a possibility of marriage may exist, cannot be given a colour of a false pretext to marry, in the event of a fall out.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma quashed criminal proceedings initiated against appellant Biswajyoti Chatterjee, an ex judicial officer.

While posted as judicial officer, he was alleged to have exploited a woman since 2014 as she came in contact with him during the pendency of her marital discord with her then husband.

Having examined the facts of the case, the bench said the physical relationship between the complainant and the appellant was consensual, that cannot be said to be without her consent or against her will.

"It is such lis that amounts to an abuse of process of law, and it is under such circumstances, that we deem fit to terminate the proceedings at the stage of charge itself," the bench said.

During the pendency of the litigation arising out of a marital discord with her ex-husband, the woman came in contact with the appellant, then posted as ACJM, Haldia, Dist Purba, Medinipur.

It was the case of the complainant that the appellant, who was also separated from his wife, had assured the complainant that he will marry her and will take complete responsibility of her and her son from the first marriage, as his own, once she gets divorced.

He purportedly kept the complainant in a rented house at Tamluk, and got her son admitted in Tamralipta Public School, at his expense. The appellant also regularly transferred money into the bank account of the complainant for her day-to-day expenses and that of her son. It was allegedly on this pretext that the appellant had physical relations with the complainant on multiple occasions.

In its judgment, the court noted the incident is of the year 2014 and any further litigation, will only prolong the suffering of both the parties, who are living their own separate lives. At the time of the alleged incident, the appellant was 56 years old, while the complainant was 36 years old, having a child aged 11 years.  

The bench said It is her own case that during the relevant time, he had duly informed her that he was separated from his wife. The complainant who was well aware of the personal as well as the professional background of the appellant, had been receiving financial help from him for herself and her son. She must have carefully weighed her decision before entering into a relationship with the appellant, the court said.

"Even if we take the case of the complainant at the face value or consider that the relationship was based on an offer of marriage, the complainant cannot plead ‘misconception of fact’ or ‘rape on the false pretext to marry’. It is from day one that she had knowledge and was conscious of the fact, that he was in a subsisting marriage, though separated," the bench noted.

It is upon having an active understanding of the circumstances, actions and the consequences of the acts, that she made a reasoned choice to sustain a relationship with him. Her conduct ex-facie represents a reasoned deliberation, the bench found.

"In our considered view, even if the allegations in the FIR and the charge-sheet are taken at their face value, it is improbable that she had engaged in a physical relationship with the appellant, only on account of an assurance of marriage," the bench said.

The court said, one may argue that he was in a position of power to exert influence, however, there is nothing on record to establish ‘inducement’ or ‘enticement’.
 

 [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email