38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, July 26, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15, 1947: Supreme Court

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      14 October, 2023 05:38 PM      0 Comments
Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15 1947 Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said the question -- whether the suit filed for a right to worship at Varanasi's Gyanvapi mosque is barred from the Place of Worship Act, 1991 or not -- would depend on character and status of the structure as on August 15, 1947, the cut off date fixed under the statute.

On Friday, the Muslims side contended that the ongoing suit was barred under the 1991 law.

To this, a bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said, "The Act says you can't alter or convert nature of place. They're not seeking conversion of the place. The question is what is the status of place as on August 15, 1947."

The bench referred to the plea by the plaintiff which was about their right to pray at the site.

Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi once again cited the 1991 law , which was enacted to freeze the status of religious places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947.

"You are saying that the relief they claim is directly in the teeth of Places of Worship Act. Now the question whether it is barred by the Act would depend upon character of the religious place as on August 15, 1947," the bench said.

The counsel claimed it is ex facie barred because the plaint itself states it is a Masjid.

Senior advocate Madhavi Divan, appearing for a group of Hindu women, denied the contention.

The court posted the matter for consideration on Monday.

The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi had questioned the maintainability of the suit as well as subsequent orders passed for undertaking a scientific survey by the Archaeological Survey of India at the Gyanvapi complex.

A structure claimed by the Hindu litigants to be a "Shivling" at 'Wazukhana' (ablution area) was found during the court appointed commissioner's survey in May, 2022. The Muslim side projected it  as a fountain.

The Hindu side claimed Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, one of the twelve Jyotirlingas, was first destroyed by the army of Qutb-ud-din Aibak, in 1194 CE. In 1669 CE, Aurangzeb again destroyed the temple and built the Gyanvapi Mosque in its place. The remains of the erstwhile Temple can be seen in the foundation, the columns and at the rear part of the mosque, they claimed.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity

A three-judge panel: Justices Chandrachud, Kant, and Narasihma will take up the matter today at 3 PM. When it came to namaz and other religious rituals, Muslims had been concerned that a Civil Court order protecting the alleged location of a Shivling would interfere with their right of access to mosques. The Supreme Court overturned that decision on May 17.

Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court

The Supreme Court had on Friday heard the Special Leave Petition regarding the Gyanvapi issue and had ordered that Order 7 Rule 11 Application being tried in the subordinate court of Varanasi be sent to the District Judge, as the Court was of the opinion that a seasoned hand would be required to handle the matter.

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991 Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

TRENDING NEWS

allegations-against-rahul-gandhi-indicated-deliberate-spreading-of-hatred-up-govt-tells-sc
Trending Executive
Allegations against Rahul Gandhi indicated deliberate spreading of hatred, UP govt tells SC

UP govt tells SC that Rahul Gandhi’s Savarkar remarks show deliberate hate-mongering; supports summons citing prima facie case under Sections 153A & 505 IPC.

25 July, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-raps-ktka-hc-on-manner-of-granting-bail-to-actor-darshan-in-murder-case
Trending Judiciary
SC raps Ktka HC on manner of granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case

SC slams Karnataka HC for granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case, calls reasoning flawed and akin to acquittal; reserves order on state’s plea.

25 July, 2025 01:49 PM

TOP STORIES

fight-your-battles-before-electorate-sc-to-ktka-govt-on-plea-against-quashing-fir-against-bjp-mp-tejaswi-surya
Trending Judiciary
'Fight your battles before electorate,' SC to Ktka govt on plea against quashing FIR against BJP MP Tejaswi Surya

SC tells K’taka to fight political battles at ballot, not court—rejects plea against HC order quashing FIR on Tejasvi Surya’s fake news tweet.

21 July, 2025 01:41 PM
sc-to-consider-on-july-22-president-reference-on-timeline-related-to-bills-passed-by-state-legislatures
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider on July 22 President reference on timeline related to Bills passed by State legislatures

SC to examine Presidential reference on July 22 over court’s power to set timelines for Governor, President on clearing state Bills.

21 July, 2025 01:46 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-centre-states-on-ashwini-upadhyays-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-seller-details-under-consumer-protection-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice To Centre, States on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Seller Details Under Consumer Protection Act

SC issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of seller details to protect consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

21 July, 2025 04:47 PM
let-political-battles-be-fought-in-electorate-sc-refuses-to-entertain-eds-plea-against-ktka-cms-wife-in-muda-scam
Trending Judiciary
'Let political battles be fought in electorate,' SC refuses to entertain ED's plea against Ktka CM's wife in MUDA scam

SC refuses to hear ED plea against K’taka CM’s wife in MUDA scam, says political battles must be fought in the electorate, not through agencies.

21 July, 2025 04:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email