38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15, 1947: Supreme Court

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      14 October, 2023 05:38 PM      0 Comments
Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15 1947 Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said the question -- whether the suit filed for a right to worship at Varanasi's Gyanvapi mosque is barred from the Place of Worship Act, 1991 or not -- would depend on character and status of the structure as on August 15, 1947, the cut off date fixed under the statute.

On Friday, the Muslims side contended that the ongoing suit was barred under the 1991 law.

To this, a bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said, "The Act says you can't alter or convert nature of place. They're not seeking conversion of the place. The question is what is the status of place as on August 15, 1947."

The bench referred to the plea by the plaintiff which was about their right to pray at the site.

Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi once again cited the 1991 law , which was enacted to freeze the status of religious places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947.

"You are saying that the relief they claim is directly in the teeth of Places of Worship Act. Now the question whether it is barred by the Act would depend upon character of the religious place as on August 15, 1947," the bench said.

The counsel claimed it is ex facie barred because the plaint itself states it is a Masjid.

Senior advocate Madhavi Divan, appearing for a group of Hindu women, denied the contention.

The court posted the matter for consideration on Monday.

The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi had questioned the maintainability of the suit as well as subsequent orders passed for undertaking a scientific survey by the Archaeological Survey of India at the Gyanvapi complex.

A structure claimed by the Hindu litigants to be a "Shivling" at 'Wazukhana' (ablution area) was found during the court appointed commissioner's survey in May, 2022. The Muslim side projected it  as a fountain.

The Hindu side claimed Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, one of the twelve Jyotirlingas, was first destroyed by the army of Qutb-ud-din Aibak, in 1194 CE. In 1669 CE, Aurangzeb again destroyed the temple and built the Gyanvapi Mosque in its place. The remains of the erstwhile Temple can be seen in the foundation, the columns and at the rear part of the mosque, they claimed.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity

A three-judge panel: Justices Chandrachud, Kant, and Narasihma will take up the matter today at 3 PM. When it came to namaz and other religious rituals, Muslims had been concerned that a Civil Court order protecting the alleged location of a Shivling would interfere with their right of access to mosques. The Supreme Court overturned that decision on May 17.

Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court

The Supreme Court had on Friday heard the Special Leave Petition regarding the Gyanvapi issue and had ordered that Order 7 Rule 11 Application being tried in the subordinate court of Varanasi be sent to the District Judge, as the Court was of the opinion that a seasoned hand would be required to handle the matter.

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991 Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email