38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15, 1947: Supreme Court

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      14 October, 2023 05:38 PM      0 Comments
Gyanvapi suit barred by 1991 law or not would depend on its character as on Aug 15 1947 Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said the question -- whether the suit filed for a right to worship at Varanasi's Gyanvapi mosque is barred from the Place of Worship Act, 1991 or not -- would depend on character and status of the structure as on August 15, 1947, the cut off date fixed under the statute.

On Friday, the Muslims side contended that the ongoing suit was barred under the 1991 law.

To this, a bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said, "The Act says you can't alter or convert nature of place. They're not seeking conversion of the place. The question is what is the status of place as on August 15, 1947."

The bench referred to the plea by the plaintiff which was about their right to pray at the site.

Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi once again cited the 1991 law , which was enacted to freeze the status of religious places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947.

"You are saying that the relief they claim is directly in the teeth of Places of Worship Act. Now the question whether it is barred by the Act would depend upon character of the religious place as on August 15, 1947," the bench said.

The counsel claimed it is ex facie barred because the plaint itself states it is a Masjid.

Senior advocate Madhavi Divan, appearing for a group of Hindu women, denied the contention.

The court posted the matter for consideration on Monday.

The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Varanasi had questioned the maintainability of the suit as well as subsequent orders passed for undertaking a scientific survey by the Archaeological Survey of India at the Gyanvapi complex.

A structure claimed by the Hindu litigants to be a "Shivling" at 'Wazukhana' (ablution area) was found during the court appointed commissioner's survey in May, 2022. The Muslim side projected it  as a fountain.

The Hindu side claimed Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi, one of the twelve Jyotirlingas, was first destroyed by the army of Qutb-ud-din Aibak, in 1194 CE. In 1669 CE, Aurangzeb again destroyed the temple and built the Gyanvapi Mosque in its place. The remains of the erstwhile Temple can be seen in the foundation, the columns and at the rear part of the mosque, they claimed.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity Hindu Plaintiff to SC: Places Of Worship Act Not Applicable; Gyanvapi Not A Mosque; Property Continues To Vest With Deity

A three-judge panel: Justices Chandrachud, Kant, and Narasihma will take up the matter today at 3 PM. When it came to namaz and other religious rituals, Muslims had been concerned that a Civil Court order protecting the alleged location of a Shivling would interfere with their right of access to mosques. The Supreme Court overturned that decision on May 17.

Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court Ashwini Upadhyay Who Challenged Places of Worship Act Seeks Impleadment In Gyanvapi Dispute Before Supreme Court

The Supreme Court had on Friday heard the Special Leave Petition regarding the Gyanvapi issue and had ordered that Order 7 Rule 11 Application being tried in the subordinate court of Varanasi be sent to the District Judge, as the Court was of the opinion that a seasoned hand would be required to handle the matter.

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991 Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

Exclu Interview: Another petition by Adv. Chandra Shekhar challenging Places of Worship Act 1991

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email