38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, August 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

HC judges not to be discriminated on service conditions if appointed from district judiciary: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      11 November, 2024 05:45 PM      0 Comments
HC judges not to be discriminated on service conditions if appointed from district judiciary SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said the High Court judges are one homogeneous group, and they can't be discriminated on service condition or pension benefits on the ground of having been appointed from district judiciary.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said all judges of the High Court are entrusted with the same constitutional function of discharging duties of adjudication under the law.

"Once appointed, their birthmarks stand obliterated and any attempt to make a distinction between judges, either for the purpose of determining their conditions of service while in service or any form of retiral dues would be unconstitutional," the court said.

The court allowed a plea by Justice Shailendra Singh, and other judges from the Patna High Court, and quashed a letter of December 30, 2022 Union government's Department of Law and Justice.

The letter stated that judges appointed by direct recruitment to the state judicial service after the adoption of the New Pension Scheme in April 2004 by the state governments and subsequently appointed as High Court Judges are covered by the Contributory Provident Scheme of the state government, they would not be eligible to subscribe to the General Provident Fund.

In its November 5 judgment, the court held that the letter is not only based on a mis-appreciation of the statutory scheme underlying under Section 20 of the the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act 1954 but is fundamentally at odds with the constitutional status of judges of the High Court as a homogenous class.

The bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, said any determination of the service benefits of sitting judges of the High Court and the retiral benefits, including pension, must take place on the basis of the fundamental principle of non-discrimination between judges who constitute one homogenous group.

Article 217 of the Constitution specified distinct sources of recruitment for judges of the High Court from the district judiciary or, as the case may be, the Bar, but once appointed to the High Court, all judges formed one homogenous class of constitutional office holders, it pointed out.

The court also said the object of providing for a Parliamentary determination of service conditions, in particular, the salary, allowances and pension was to bring about national uniformity in the conditions of service both of sitting and former judges of High Courts.

"Therefore, it is not within the contemplation of the Constitution that the payment of salaries and the extension of other benefits both during and after service should be left to the vagaries of determination by individual States and the schemes which are applicable to civil service officers discharging duties in each State," the bench said.
  [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

why-so-many-students-dying-by-suicides-sc-asks-iit-kharagpur
Trending Judiciary
Why so many students dying by suicides, SC asks IIT Kharagpur

SC asks IIT Kharagpur why students are dying by suicide; raises concern amid rising campus deaths despite new mental health guidelines.

29 July, 2025 11:51 AM
sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-dog-bite-incidents
Trending Judiciary
SC takes suo motu cognisance of dog bite incidents

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of rising dog bite cases after 6-year-old girl dies of rabies; terms media report alarming and disturbing.

29 July, 2025 01:38 PM
sc-quashes-fir-against-ace-shuttler-lakshya-sen-others-for-forging-birth-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC quashes FIR against ace Shuttler Lakshya Sen, others for forging birth certificate [Read Judgment]

SC quashes FIR against shuttler Lakshya Sen, says forgery case based on vendetta, lacked merit and abused criminal process.

29 July, 2025 04:20 PM
supreme-court-to-hear-presidential-reference-on-bill-clearance-timelines-from-august-19
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court to Hear Presidential Reference on Bill Clearance Timelines from August 19

SC to hear Presidential Reference on timelines for Governors & President to clear Bills, from Aug 19 to Sept 10; Kerala & TN oppose maintainability.

29 July, 2025 04:43 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email